MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1991976435 · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn040

Human and climate forcing of zooplankton populations

2008· article· en· W1991976435 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Dagg, Shin-ichi Uye, Luis Valdés, Roger Harris

Notice bibliographique

RevueICES Journal of Marine Science · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMarine and fisheries research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésZooplanktonCalanus finmarchicusPelagic zoneEcosystemOceanographyPhytoplanktonEnvironmental scienceMarine ecosystemEcologyFisheryGeographyBiologyCrustaceanGeologyCopepod

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Zooplankton play a key role in the pelagic foodweb by controlling phytoplankton production and shaping pelagic ecosystems. In addition, because of their critical role as a food source for larval and juvenile fish, the dynamics of zooplankton populations have a significant influence on recruitment to fish stocks. In 1961, ICES convened the First Zooplankton Production Symposium in Charlottenlund, Denmark. ICES also played a leading role in the Second Zooplankton Production Symposium on “Zooplankton Production: measurement and role in global ecosystem dynamics and biogeochemical cycles”, held in Plymouth, UK, in 1994. The increasing importance of international programmes such as GLOBEC, the general concerns about global change, and the changing role of zooplankton in ocean ecosystems were reflected in the development of this Symposium. This trend was developed further in the Third Zooplankton Production Symposium on “The role of zooplankton in global ecosystem dynamics: comparative studies from the world oceans”, held in Gijón, Spain, in 2003. It was the first time that the Symposium was co-sponsored by ICES, PICES, and GLOBEC. The Fourth International Zooplankton Production Symposium was held in Hiroshima, Japan, from 28 May to 1 June 2007. This Symposium, co-sponsored by ICES, PICES, and GLOBEC, was the first of the series to be held outside Europe, and its focus was on “Human and climate forcing of zooplankton populations”. This symposium not only provided a better knowledge of zooplankton production processes but also contributed to a deeper understanding of all marine ecosystems. Zooplanktologists from countries around the world met to address issues important to marine science and to society in this time of rapid and serious climate change. The week-long symposium involved 334 participants from 46 countries, who contributed 141 oral and 250 poster presentations. These demographics clearly indicated the international nature of zooplankton research. The opening plenary session provided three excellent presentations on different aspects of the symposium theme: Papers based on these three plenary presentations are included in this symposium issue of the ICES Journal. Parallel oral sessions on a wide range of important zooplankton topics followed throughout the duration of the meeting, and served as the basis for the remaining papers in this special volume. These were: Before the main Symposium, three well-attended 1-day workshops were held. The topics were: A collection of papers from the krill workshop will be published in a special issue of Deep Sea Research. “Impacts of ocean acidification on marine zooplankton: knowns and unknowns”, Victoria J. Fabry; “In hot water: zooplankton communities now and in the future”, Anthony J. Richardson; “The role of microzooplankton in a changing ocean”, Albert Calbet. “Global comparisons of zooplankton time-series”, David L. Mackas (Canada) and Luis Valdés (Spain), conveners; “Importance of zooplankton in biogeochemical cycles”, Hiroaki Saito (Japan) and Deborah K. Steinberg (USA), conveners; “The role of zooplankton in foodwebs: changes related to impacts of climate variability and human perturbation”, Hans G. Dam (USA) and Michael St John (Germany), conveners; “Mortality impacts on the ontogeny and productivity of zooplankton”, Mark Ohman (USA), Serge Poulet (France), and Anthony Verschoor (The Netherlands), conveners; “Zooplankton functional groups in ecosystems”, Sanae Chiba (Japan) and Sun Song (People's Republic of China), conveners; “Microbial loop vs. classical short food chains: implications for appraisal of foodweb efficiency and productivity”, Ulf Bamstedt (Sweden), convener; “Environmental and other constraints on zooplankton behaviour, life histories, and demography”, Charles B. Miller (USA) and Atsushi Tsuda (Japan), conveners; “Zooplankton biochemistry and physiology: practical and potential biotechnology applications”, Ann Bucklin (USA), Adrianna Ianora (Italy), and Kurt Tande (Norway), conveners; “Advances in image technologies and the application of image analysis to count and identify plankton”, Cabell Davis (USA) and Xabier Irigoien (Spain), conveners; “Analysis and synthesis: modelling zooplankton in aquatic ecosystems”, Daniel Grunbaum (USA) and Michio Kishi (Japan), conveners. Workshop 1: “Temporal and regional responses of zooplankton to global warming: phenology and poleward displacement”, Wulf Greve (Germany), convener; Workshop 2: “Zooplankton research in Asian countries: current status and future prospects”, Sun Song (People's Republic of China), Sanae Chiba (Japan), and Young Shil Kang (Korea), conveners. Workshop 3: “Krill research: current status and its future”, So Kawaguchi (Australia) and William T. Peterson (USA), conveners. We anticipate significant advances before the next Zooplankton Symposium, such as automated/semi-automated characterization of zooplankton spatial and temporal distribution on a global scale, coupling foodweb models from phytoplankton to fish, coupling between physical and biological models, and assessments and prediction of climate change on marine resources and marine ecosystems. Society is beginning to demand a predictive capability regarding marine ecosystems, and it is likely that this will be a major challenge for the community. With developing new technologies, carefully posed new questions and hypotheses, and with new people entering the field, progress is assured. The quality of papers presented at this Fourth Zooplankton Symposium provides us all with real confidence for the future.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,045
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,090

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueICES Journal of Marine ScienceMême sujetMarine and fisheries researchTravaux en français237 207