Abstract B14: FISH-based differentiation of adenoma carcinoma (AC) from squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC): Optimizing probe selection using in silico modeling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: FISH is a powerful technique to detect specific genomic sequences within an individual cell. Differences in the genetic makeup of AC and SqCC of the lung have been documented. A robust genetic based test applicable to sections from FFPE for the classification of AC vs SqCC tissue could have clinical utility as this classification can determine treatment selection. The optimal translation of array based genetic alterations data (in the form of copy number alterations) into a select set of FISH probes is nontrivial. One must consider the type (gain or loss), the extent and fidelity of the alteration (length in base pairs of the alteration common across the data set being considered which will affect FISH probe signal strength). Also one must consider effects the sectioning process will have on the actual FISH measurements; thick sections – more complete nuclei (better genetic loci fidelity) but more nuclear overlap (more difficult recognition of individual nuclei), thin sections – less nuclei overlap between cells but less complete nuclei. We use an in silico simulation to model the effect sectioning will have on the robustness and efficacy of a FISH based classifier for the genetic based differentiation of AC from SqCC tissue. Methods: High resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) tiling array data was used to identify recurrent copy number alterations that could be used to differentiate between 169 AC and 92 SqCC cases. An in silico simulation of the sectioning process on the detection of these alterations was programmed in MATLAB. This simulation modeled the physical distribution of the DNA sequence, chromosome by chromosome within individual modeled nuclei. For each of the 261 cases chromosomal loci gains were randomly inserted into the cell's DNA irrespective of chromosome and chromosomal loci deletions were assumed to occur in only one of that specific chromosome type. Gains and losses were assumed to linearly affect the size of chromosomes and cell nuclei. Cell nuclei sectioning was simulated 300 times for each case (10 different nuclear rotations for each of ten different chromosomal placement simulations within the nucleus for three different section thicknesses of 4um, 7um and 10 um). The number of spots that would be detected by FISH for each of these 300 simulations for each case for all 24,817 loci measured by the aCGH was saved for later classification accuracy analysis. Results: The accuracy of the in silico model was checked against expected out comes; 1) such as the average loss of FISH spots as a function of the loss of nuclear volume to sectioning for loci with 1, 2 or 3 expected copies and 2) the concurrent loss of adjacent loci, or the loss of all loci within a chromosome with the loss of that chromosome. These measures were validated across at least 10K simulations. From the simulations we computed graphs of the number of loci retained as a function of the maximum radius of the nuclear material left within the section for each cell (an observable feature under microscopy). Further we calculated what percentage of nuclei within the section would have a maximum radius larger than 50, 60, 70, 80 or 90% of the pre-section nuclear radius for each case. This was done the 3 section thickness. Finally we used the simulation data to see the effect of sectioning on case classification, the number of cells which must be measured per case for optimal classification and the selection of the optimal genomic loci to differentiate the two types of tissue.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».