MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1992505090 · doi:10.1310/hpj4401-47

Quarter Watch: 2008 Quarter 1 : QUARTER WATCH PROJECT TEAM

2009· article· en· W1992505090 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas J. Moore, Michael R. Cohen, Curt D. Furberg

Notice bibliographique

RevueHospital Pharmacy · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
ThématiquePharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)MedicineHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A record number of deaths and serious injuries associated with drug therapy were reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the first quarter of 2008. Serious injuries associated with drug therapy reached a total of 20,745 new cases; there were a total of 4,824 reported deaths, a 2.6-fold increase from the previous quarter. In addition, varenicline (Chantix, Champix), an aid to smoking cessation, accounted for more reported serious injuries than any other prescription drug for a second quarter, with a total of 1,001 new cases and including 50 additional deaths. Varenicline was the subject of a previ ous Quarter Watch Special Report and a separate FDA Public Health Alert about psychiatric adverse events. Ranked second in reported serious injuries was heparin, a drug that helps prevent injury from blood clots. Heparin was the subject of a major product recall after a potentially lethal contaminant was identified and traced to suppliers in China. In the first quarter of 2008, the FDA received reports of 779 cases of serious injury in which heparin was the principal suspect drug. These findings come from a program being developed by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) for improvement of patient safety through increasing understanding of how and why drugrelated injuries and medication errors occur. The results are from analyses of new adverse drug event reports submitted to the FDA. The agency releases computer excerpts of these reports for research use after personal-identifying information has been removed. However, the results of this monitoring program should be interpreted with caution because of the known limitations of these data and the nature of the overall system through which adverse events are monitored in the United States. Because reporting is voluntary, only a small fraction of adverse drug events that occur are ever reported to the FDA or to drug manufacturers who then investigate and forward reports to the agency. Although the sum totals of reported adverse event reports usually provide an accurate overall adverse event profile for a drug, the individual reports themselves do not prove that the drug caused the event described. Trends in Reported Cases Serious injuries and deaths associated with drug therapy were reported for a record total of 20,745 persons in the first quarter of 2008. The total was 38% higher than the average for the previous 4 quarters and the highest for any quarter. Reported deaths totaled 4,824 cases, a 2.6-fold increase over the previous quarter and the highest number of deaths in a calendar quarter since 2004. Fatal cases also accounted for a larger share of all serious cases, 23% of those in the first quarter of 2008 compared with an historical average of 16%. Identifiable medication errors accounted for 7.1% (1,464) of all cases of serious injury. The largest numbers of cases were divided evenly between errors of administration (wrong drug, wrong dose, or wrong route of administration) and overdoses (both accidental and intentional). Most drugs in medical use produced only a small number of reports of serious injury or death. One-half the 773 identifiable drugs tracked in the most recent quarter had 6 or fewer serious adverse events reported. Only 50 drugs accounted for 100 or more reported serious injuries. Hospital Pharmacy Volume 44, Number 1, pp 47–56 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,479
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,743

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4790,307

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,069
Tête enseignante GPT0,427
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHospital PharmacyMême sujetPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsTravaux en français237 207