MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1993396039 · doi:10.1080/02722010209481080

The Domestic Politics of Quebec's Quest for External Distinctiveness

2002· article· en· W1993396039 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Louis Bélanger

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOptimal distinctiveness theoryPoliticsForeign policyConstitutionMeaning (existential)Political scienceInternational relationsInterpretation (philosophy)AssertionSociologyLawPublic administrationPsychologySocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

For more than forty years now, the Quebec government has conducted a distinct diplomatic activity, taking advantage of all the room for maneuver given by the Canadian constitution and using its political leverage inside the federation. The goal of this article is to examine the internal motivating factors for Quebec's international actions and, as it does so, it attempts to respond to the following questions: To what can we attribute the specific character of Quebec's case with respect to other manifestations of international involvement by noncentral governments? What are the most important international objectives pursued by Quebec? What methods and strategies are used in order to attain these objectives? Are these strategies proving to be effective; that is, are these objectives being attained? Such an exercise could not be accomplished without raking into consideration the highly intersubjective nature of Quebec's international presence and status--a fact underscored by the content and structure of this special issue. In the first place, there would obviously be no call for truly international dealings on the part of Quebec if there were no foreign partners available to undertake such relations with its official representatives, sometimes at the highest levels. More importantly perhaps, Quebec's foreign policy makers, who are well aware of the situation, are primordially concerned by the interpretation that will be made outside Quebec of the ultimate purpose of this policy, and they integrate this information into their strategies. Therefore, Quebec's objectives of international assertion are adapted to different registers of meaning from which foreign actors would interpret its foreign policy behavior. Thus, from the decolonization era of the 1960s to our current postmodern period, and depending o n the sensitivity of their interlocutors, Quebec officials have tried to craft their interventions in order to be considered as representatives of a nation, a province, a homeland, an economy, a people, a state. Similarly, Quebec's identity itself, on whose behalf this autonomous foreign policy is pursued, is the object of constant negotiation between the way in which Quebeckers perceive themselves and how this corresponds to the types of legitimate expression of identity emerging within the world order. (1) The task I have been assigned in this special issue leads me to explore the domestic side of these matters. An Identity-Based Paradiplomacy Recent works on the international involvement of noncentral governments (NCGs) have shown the importance of distinguishing between two manifestations of this phenomenon, widely referred to as paradiplomacy. (2) On the one hand, in most cases, paradiplomacy is triggered by functional interests--that is, interests of local governments as agents of economic development and managers of the human and environmental resources of a given territory. In such cases, the development of paradiplomatic activities will generally be decentralized, strongly associated with specific transnational issues, and erratic. In Canada, the Alberta government is a good example of functional interest-based paradiplomatic activity; its activities are strongly linked to the state of Canada-U.S. relations in the area of energy policies. On the other hand, some NCGs are pursuing a paradiplomacy in the name of identity-based interests. In those cases, the existence of a common identity and of a certain kind of national interest gives coherence and continuity to the involvement in international affairs, while subjecting it to the politics of identity and nation-building. In her analysis of the foreign policy of the Belgian federated entities, which most closely approach Quebec in their form and level of development, Francoise Massart-Pierard clearly demonstrates that this identity aspect makes all the difference. (3) This leads her to consider the Belgian Communities and Regions as hybrid international actors, half nation-state and half regional authority, where the task of reinforcing identity is superimposed on that of responding to the functional needs (for example, economic, environmental) of the region they govern. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,093
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,677

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,014
Communication savante0,0100,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations29
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207