Requirements for Communication Systems in Future Passenger Air Transportation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Airports Council International (ACI) estimates that the number of global passengers will increase from over 5 billion passengers today to 12 billion by 2031. At the same time, major aircraft (A/C) manufacturers like Boeing and Airbus estimate that the worldwide commercial A/C fleet will increase 5% per year over the next 20 years, i.e. the commercial aviation market will be doubled. This growth will require not only new airports infrastructure but also investments in en-route and Air Traffic Management (ATM) systems. Part of such investments must be aimed to a growth in the capacity of the onboard communication systems. With increasing speed of Internet connections on land, passengers expect not only to be connected to the Internet but also to have good connectivity with high bandwidth to enable them the access and use of multitude applications during the flight. The need to be connected adds to the increased passenger traffic and even the implementation of new aviation standards such as: Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC), Future Air Navigation System (FANS), Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), VHF Data Link mode 2/3/4 (VDL2/3/4), etc. Governmental initiatives such as NextGen in U.S.A. and Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) in Europe are forcing aviation companies to fulfill these needs to satisfy their customers while complying with regulations in different airspaces. As a result, the aviation industry faces a new paradigm in the communication system requirements, which is the subject of this paper. As a first requirement, the industry must be prepared for seamlessly adoption of future communication systems, standards, or regulation without this implying the continuous installation of new equipment, but rather the modification of the existing one. Today, any modernization of these systems represents a major change in airborne and on-land equipment, which means buying new equipment, installation of new antennas on the A/C, etc. The main repercussions of this lack of flexibility and scalability are that many of the systems currently used have become obsolete, their modernization, when possible, is highly constrained by previous limitations, and new deployments are painfully long. Therefore, the modernization of the onboard communication systems has to be flexible enough to address all these drawbacks. This paper also discusses several Requirements for Communication Systems in Future Passenger Air Transportation (RCSFPAT). Requirements like the bandwidth, which will depend on factors that cannot yet be predicted accurately (amount of increase in air traffic, capabilities of service providers, etc.). The two primary drivers for the RCSFPAT are: 1) to provide an appropriate communication infrastructure to support future air communication systems growth, and 2) to provide a consistent global solution to support the goal of fulfilling the communications requirements from passengers and communications between A/C Earth Stations (AESs) and Ground Earth Stations (GESs) thus to ensure flight safety. In order to provide worldwide coverage of the communication systems, the only current technology able to cover the oceanic regions is Satellite Communications (SatCom). Indeed, most of the airlines and A/C manufactures have signed
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».