MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1993546721 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0536

Telling Anxiety: Anxious Narration in the Works of Marguerite Duras, Annie Ernaux, Nathalie Sarraute, and Anne Hébert (review)

2009· article· en· W1993546721 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Janet M. Paterson

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueFrench Literature and Critical Theory
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeLiteratureResistance (ecology)ArtHistoryArt historyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Telling Anxiety: Anxious Narration in the Works of Marguerite Duras, Annie Ernaux, Nathalie Sarraute, and Anne Hébert Janet Paterson (bio) Jennifer Willging. Telling Anxiety: Anxious Narration in the Works of Marguerite Duras, Annie Ernaux, Nathalie Sarraute, and Anne Hébert. University of Toronto Press. viii, 261. $60.00 The topic of Jennifer Willging’s book will certainly interest many readers, since anxiety seems to be the malaise of our contemporary Western society. In her study, Willging examines the manifestations of anxiety in selected narratives of French writers, Marguerite Duras, Annie Ernaux, Nathalie Sarraute, and of Quebec writer, Anne Hébert. More specifically, Willging’s objective is to analyze the confluence of anxiety, desire, and narration. Though one may not agree with Willging when she states, in her introduction, that women are ‘more susceptible to anxiety than their literary brethren’ and that French and French-Canadian women have more difficulty assuming authorship than Anglo-American writers (Anne Hébert’s status as Quebec’s most illustrious author for more than six decades belies both statements), the results of her specific analyses are compelling and often fascinating. The book is divided into two parts, both in terms of content and methodology. The first two chapters focus on openly autobiographical texts: Marguerite Duras’s short narrative, ‘Monsieur X. dit ici Pierre Rabier,’ which deals with resistance and collaboration during the Second World War, and Annie Ernaux’s La honte, a narrative exposing a violent scene – the author’s father trying to kill her mother – that took place when Ernaux was eleven years old. In both chapters, truth, reality, and memory are recurring themes. Willging has recourse to other texts (notably Pierre Péan’s version of the events linked to the resistance), interviews given by the authors and their other writings to shed light on the relationship between narration, anxiety, and truth. As one would expect, the narration of past traumatic events is both gripping and problematic. Willging persuasively demonstrates the complexities inherent in these texts by showing that the ‘act of remembering both invites and hinders the act of narrating.’ The second part of the book deals with Nathalie Sarraute’s Entre la vie et la mort and Anne Hébert’s celebrated novel, Les fous de bassan (In the Shadow of the Wind). Since these texts are not autobiographical, they elicit a different kind of analysis, that is, a much closer reading of the texts. In Sarraute’s novel, Willging focuses on the narrator, who is a writer, to demonstrate the manifestations of what Harold Bloom called [End Page 431] the ‘anxiety of influence.’ It is, however, in her study of Les fous de bassan that Willging’s analytical talent becomes most apparent. Using Kristeva’s concept of the semiotic, she gives a brilliant and original demonstration of the way that sounds express, in a poetic manner, both anxiety and madness. She first examines the ‘book’ of Nicolas Jones, the pastor of a small English community on the seaside in Quebec. Though the narrative takes place in 1982, it recounts the events of 1936 when his two nieces were murdered. Prone to extreme anxiety, the old pastor is disturbed by many sounds such as the wind, insects, the beating of his heart, and an array of voices: ‘Voices, nothing but voices, sounds, nothing but sounds. I light another pipe, ears filled with the music of bygone days and shrill voices.’ Willging gives a convincing and insightful description of how anxiety permeates Nicolas’s entire discourse. Her analysis of the madness that characterizes Stevens Brown’s last letter to Michael Hotchkiss is equally convincing and detailed. The breakdown of the character’s psyche is expressed by the memory of the shrill sounds of the gannets frequently seen in the seaside village: ‘I lift my arm, the birds scatter, they cry. I drop my arm on the hospital sheet and flocks of them return and they cry once more, sharpening their beaks against my skull.’ The relationship between language and anxiety or more precisely the capacity of language to express anxiety, by means of rhythms and sounds, is clearly and at times brilliantly exemplified in this chapter. In spite of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,751
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,440

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,192
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetFrench Literature and Critical TheoryTravaux en français237 207