75 ADDITION OF HYALURONAN TO A VITRIFICATION SOLUTION FOR IMMATURE BOVINE OOCYTES SELECTED BY BRILLIANT CRESYL BLUE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of brilliant cresyl blue (BCB) selection of immature oocytes and the addition of sodium hyaluronate (HA) to the vitrification solution on survival rates of bovine oocytes vitrified using solid-phase vitrification. Bovine cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC; n = 716) obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries were used in 6 replicates. Cumulus–oocyte complexes were washed in tissue culture medium 199 (TCM-199) and randomly allocated to 2 groups to be exposed to BCB stain (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 90 min as described by Alm et al. (2005 Theriogenology 63, 2194–2205) or (control) maintained in Vigro holding medium (Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Canada) for 90 min (n = 220). Cumulus–oocyte complexes in the BCB group were selected based on their response to BCB as BCB+ (colored, n = 248) or BCB– (colorless, n = 248), whereas those in the control group were selected morphologically as described by Rodríguez-González et al. (2002 Theriogenology 57, 1397–1409). Oocytes from both BCB groups and 100 oocytes in the control group were vitrified by solid-phase vitrification as previously described by Rodriguez et al. (2012 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 24, 132). The remaining 120 oocytes in the control group were not vitrified and were matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro (in SOFaa in a controlled atmosphere) for 7 days. Vitrified oocytes were exposed to 10% ethylene glycol for 10 min, and 20% ethylene glycol + 0.2-M trehalose for 30 s, and then were subdivided to be exposed to 30% ethylene glycol + 0.5-M trehalose with or without 0.1 mg mL–1 HA (MAP 5, Bioniche Animal Health). Vitrified oocytes were stored in liquid nitrogen for at least one week and then placed directly into a 0.5-M sucrose solution (in TCM 199) at 37°C for 5 min, 0.25 M of sucrose for another 5 min, and finally TCM-199 and matured, fertilized, and cultured. Development rates (i.e. proportion of blastocysts) were examined on Day 7 after fertilization. Proportional data were first transformed by square root and then analyzed by ANOVA to detect the effect of replicate, type of oocyte (BCB+, BCB–, controls), and vitrified with or without HA or not vitrified as main effects, using the software Infostat (UNC, Argentina, 2010). There was a significant effect of oocyte type on blastocyst rate (P < 0.01) following vitrification (BCB+, 6.4 ± 0.4%. v. BCB–, 1.6 ± 0.6%). Control oocytes (not exposed to BCB) resulted in 3.0 ± 2.0% blastocysts following vitrification, which was lower to that obtained with the BCB+ oocytes. Vitrification also influenced development rates (3.0 ± 2.0 v. 32.0 ± 1.3%) for blastocysts produced from vitrified v. nonvitrified oocytes, respectively (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the use of HA in the vitrification solutions did not have a significant effect on development rates (4.7 ± 0.9 v. 3.3 ± 0.9%, for blastocysts obtained from vitrified oocytes with or without HA, respectively). In conclusion, the selection of oocytes by BCB increased the in vitro development rates of vitrified immature oocytes, whereas the use of HA in the vitrification solution did not improve the survival rates of vitrified oocytes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».