MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1994306098 · doi:10.4043/23512-ms

Autonomous Inspection of Subsea Facilities-Gulf of Mexico Trials

2012· article· en· W1994306098 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Établissements canadiensLockheed Martin (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubseaNuclear decommissioningUnderwaterSubmarine pipelineMarine engineeringSystems engineeringEngineeringScope (computer science)Pipeline transportReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceConstruction engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Lockheed Martin Corporation is conducting a multi-year technology developmentprogram to advance the state of the art of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV)inspection technologies for the offshore oil & gas industry. The scope ofthis project is to develop and demonstrate AUV technologies for conductingautonomous structural survey and inspection of subsea facilities for a widerange of applications, including pre/post-hurricane inspection of offshoreplatforms, pre/post-decommissioning structural survey, and deepwater facility /riser inspection. This paper will describe the results of Lockheed Martin'srecently completed technology demonstration project, Autonomous Inspection ofSubsea Facilities, including laboratory simulation, local offshore trials, andtechnology validation trials in the Gulf of Mexico against offshore productionplatforms. This project was jointly funded by the Research Partnership toSecure Energy for America (RPSEA), Lockheed Martin and sea trials weresupported by Chevron Energy Technology Company Capabilities demonstrated duringoffshore trials included (1) autonomous real-time three-dimensional (3D)imaging and modeling of an underwater facility, (2) detection and highlightingof changes to the facility in real time, and (3) feature-based navigation, theaiding of the AUV's navigation along its path based on feature detection andrecognition. The paper will describe the results achieved, and will highlightthe performance improvements over current platform inspection methods, including significant improvements in operating efficiencies, and thedevelopment of highly accurate 3D models for use in structural integritymanagement. Finally, the paper will outline the potential benefits of evolvingAUV and sensor technologies for applications such as structural survey, pipeline inspection, subsea facility inspection, and light intervention, including potentially game changing improvements in cost, performance, safetyand reliability that will enable more cost-effective operations in deepwaterand/or remote subsea fields. Introduction Subsea Integrity Management is defined by the Energy Institute Guidelines forthe Management of Integrity of Subsea Facilities as " the management of a subseasystem or asset to ensure that it delivers the design requirements, and doesnot harm life, health or the environment, through the required life." A keyelement in any integrity management program is regular in-service inspections. As the industry moves into deeper and harsher environments, challenges faced byoperators include the high cost of subsea inspection and the limited inspectionintervals available. Inspections provide a snapshot of the structural health ofthe system. Integrity management practices in deepwater fields rely heavily ongeneral visual inspection of subsea equipment. Remotely operated vehicles(ROVs) and divers are the primary means used today to conduct inspections -ROVs exclusively in deepwater (greater than 100-meter water depth) and diversgenerally limited to less than100-meter water depth. In both cases supportvessels larger than 70 to 100 meters with support crews numbering more than 30and with 100+ tons of equipment are required to collect the simplest visualinspection record. The quality and usefulness of the records are highlydependent on the seawater's visual clarity, illumination, camera and recordingequipment, and ROV or diver stability. An ROV inspection of a deepwaterfacility can provide visual evidence of structural degradation, impact damage, corrosion, valve damage, leaks, vibration, and other structural damage (Figure 1). Benchmarking the condition of subsea equipment following installation andtracking its status over time can provide a history of the deterioration rate. Video inspections include: well heads, valve positions, pipeline endterminations (PLETs), pipeline end manifolds (PLEMs), underwater terminationmanifolds (UTMs), flowlines, jumpers, moorings, risers, and associated cablingand equipment on the sea bed. This equipment is often spread over many squarekilometers requiring the support vessel to maneuver in DP mode for days. Inspection speed is totally dependent on the coordinated movement of the ROVand support vessel and the skill of the ROV pilot.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,704
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,936

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle