MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1994412962 · doi:10.1021/cr000074t

Coordination and Organometallic Chemistry of Metal−NO Complexes

2002· review· en· W1994412962 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueChemical Reviews · 2002
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChemistryOrganometallic chemistryCoordination complexGroup 2 organometallic chemistryMetalNanotechnologyComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeCatalysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The chemistry of transition-metal-NO complexes,
\nor metal nitrosyls, has taken on added significance in recent years because of the important role that nitric oxide has been found to play as a signaling molecule in biological systems. Recent work has also established that the characteristic chemistry of nitrosyl
\ncomplexes is often markedly different from that
\nexhibited by their isoelectronic carbonyl analogues. It has been almost 10 years since these complexes were last reviewed in the book Metal Nitrosyls,1 and so it seemed to us that an update of this rapidly expanding field would be appropriate at the present time. Consequently, this article picks up where Metal Nitrosyls left off and summarizes comprehensively the literature dealing with nitrosyl complexes from
\n1991 to mid-2001. Some particularly relevant work reported in late 2001 has been included where appropriate during the final stages of revising and polishing the text. As outlined in the table of contents, the pertinent information concerning the compounds themselves is first partitioned in terms of the position of the central transition metal in the periodic
\ntable and then in terms of the ligands other than NO present in the complexes. In the interests of keeping the article to a manageable size, most of the routine preparative and characterization data for individual
\ncompounds are simply referenced rather than being presented and discussed in detail. The review concludes with a general section that applies, in principle, to all classes of transition-metal-NO complexes, namely the characteristic reactivities of bound
\nNO groups. Whenever possible, emphasis is placed
\non the unique physical and chemical properties
\nimparted to nitrosyl complexes by the presence of the strongly electron-withdrawing NO ligands. If not specified otherwise, the abbreviations employed throughout are those summarized in the ACS Style Guide.2 Several general articles concerning nitrosyl complexes have appeared between 1991 and 2001. These include theoretical calculations on nitrosyl fragments3-
\n5 and submissions concerning electron counting
\nin nitrosyl complexes.6 Several review articles
\nhave also been written concerning a large array of nitrosyl-related topics, such as linkage isomerism,7infrared spectroscopy,8 biological aspects of nitrosyl complexes,9 etc.10,11
\nWe begin our coverage below with the group 5
\nmetals, since no well-defined nitrosyl complexes of group 3 or 4 are currently known. This state of affairs is probably due to the following factors: (1) These metals are very oxophilic. (2) Most nitrosylating agents are potent oxidizers and potential oxygenatom
\nsources. (3) The low-valent chemistry of the
\nearly metals is not as well developed as it is for groups 6-9. Consequently, requisite precursor complexes are not readily available, and most attempts to make early-metal nitrosyls lead to the formation of oxo-containing products. A few reports of nitrosyls
\nfrom groups 1-4 do exist, though. The interaction of NO with Na+ and K+ in the zeolite ETS-10 at 100 K results in the formation of the weakly bound adducts M+âââNO and M+âââON.12 Also, the species Be(NO), Mg(NO), Sc(NO), Sc(è2-NO), and Ti(NO) have been detected in argon matrixes as the products resulting from the reactions of laser-ablated metal atoms with nitric oxide.13,14 The complex Cp2Zr(NO)(PMe3) has been invoked as an intermediate during the reaction between Cp2Zr(PMe3)2 and NO.15

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,972
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,160
Tête enseignante GPT0,341
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle