Gallstones during Octreotide Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gallbladder stones (GBS) are found in up to 50% of patients receiving octreotide, but the reported prevalence of cholecystolithiasis in patients treated with octreotide is variable and little is known about gallstone incidence, composition, pathogenetic mechanisms, dissolvability, and primary prevention. Octreotide treatment apart, in industrialised societies most GBS are mixed in composition, cholesterol-rich (arbitrarily >70% cholesterol by weight), radiolucent (70%), and, given a patent cystic duct (70%). dissolvable in bile rendered unsaturated in cholesterol by oral ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) + chenodeoxycholic (CDCA) acid treatment. They form when (1) GB bile becomes supersaturated with cholesterol (as the molar ratio of cholesterol to phospholipids in biliary vesicles approaches 1 :I, the vesicles become unstable); (2) there is an imbalance between proand anti-nucleating factors, which favors cholesterol crystal precipitation; and (3) there is stasis within the GB as a result of altered motor function and/or excess mucus that traps the crystals. These changes may be associated with altered (4) biliary bile acid composition (more DCA and less CDCA than normal), and/or (5) phospholipid fatty acid composition (arachidonyl-rich lecithin acting as a substrate for mucosal prostaglandin synthesis which, in turn, may influence both gallbladder motility, and mucus glycoprotein synthesis and secretion). During octreotide treatment, meal-stimulated cholecystokinin (CCK) release is impaired leading to GB hypomotility, but little is known about the effects of octreotide on biliary cholesterol saturation, crystal nucleation time, mucus glycoprotein concentration, bile acid or phospholipid fatty acid composition. Most, but not all, reports suggest that the prevalence of GBS in octreotide-treated patients is considerably greater than that in age-, sex-, and weight-matched controls, but proof (by pre-treatment and on-treatment ultrasound) that the GBS were absent before, but developed during, therapy is not always available. Furthermore, there are few data on analysis of GBS composition in patients developing stones during treatment, although initial reports suggest that octreotideassociated GBS are also radiolucent, cholesterol-rich, and dissolve with oral bile acid treatment. Maximum GBS attenuation values, measured in Hounsfield Units (HU) by localized computerized tomography scanning of the GB, predict stone composition and dissolvability: GBS with scores of less than 100 HU are cholesterol-rich and dissolve well with oral bile acid treatment. However, preliminary results in 11 acromegalic patients treated with 200 to 600 pg octreotide/d for 29 to 68 months show that the HU scores range from 23 to 490 (mean f SEM, 116 it 41). suggesting that at least four of these 11 patients have noncholesterol stones. Gallstone dissolvability is being assessed by studying the response to oral UDCA (10 mg . kg-kg-‘&‘). Liquid test meal-stimulated immunoreactive CCK release and gallbladder contraction are also being measured before and during treatment, as are biliary bile acid and lipid composition, cholesterol saturation indices, and crystal nucleation times in samples of fasting bile obtained by ultrasound-guided skinny-needle aspiration of the GB. Only after establishing the relative contributions of these different pathogenetic mechanisms will we be in a position to plan, logically, prophylactic measures to prevent octreotide-induced GBS formation. Copyright 61 1992 by W.B. Saunders Company
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».