<i>HUGHES ET AL. RESPOND</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Siemieniuk et al. reported their experience with routine opt-out HIV screening in Southern Alberta, Canada, and the limitations of this approach. While we believe that routine opt-out testing has been a critical factor in reducing mother to child transmission (MTCT) of HIV in our region, we acknowledge that this approach does not eliminate the risk. Over the past 5 years (2004 to 2008 inclusive), approximately 3.5% of women have opted out of HIV prenatal testing in Alberta. Opportunities to prevent MTCT may be missed in women who decline testing. In addition, women may not seek prenatal care, as was the case for the single infant who was perinatally infected with HIV in our study. Following the completion of our study in February 2006, we have had 2 additional cases of MTCT in Northern Alberta. In the first case, a woman originally from an HIV endemic country who had been living in Europe for several years arrived in Canada near the term of her pregnancy. She was assumed to have negative prenatal serology (records were in a foreign language) and was not tested by her obstetrician. She developed Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia 7 months postpartum and she and her infant proved to be HIV positive. In the second case, an Aboriginal woman with no other risk factors requested testing 6 weeks postpartum, as she suspected her partner had recently acquired HIV; both she and her infant were found to be HIV positive. An HIV test that had been performed during the second trimester of her pregnancy was negative. The cases presented by Siemieniuk et al., in addition to our own experience, confirm that further strategies to eliminate MTCT are needed. As recommended by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, strategies to further reduce the incidence of MTCT may include a second HIV test in the third trimester, either in all women or in identified high-risk groups. In addition, rapid HIV testing during labor is recommended for women with undocumented HIV status.1 The acceptability and feasibility of rapid HIV testing during labor has been demonstrated in a multicenter trial.2 We believe that approaches to eliminating MTCT should include development of more accessible, acceptable, and flexible antenatal services, including HIV testing for disadvantaged populations, to reduce the number of women not receiving prenatal care. In noncompliant pregnant women, minimizing the risk of MTCT will continue to require a flexible, multidisciplinary, and inevitably labor-intensive individualized response.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,063 | 0,028 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».