Spinal Cord Injury in Postearthquake Haiti: Lessons Learned and Future Needs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Just before 5 PM on January 12, 2010, a 7.0 earthquake struck Haiti, a Caribbean nation that shares the island of Hispaniola with the Dominican Republic.The epicenter was approximately 10 miles southwest of Port-au-Prince, the capital of Haiti.Port-au-Prince is the country's largest city and is an overcrowded, sprawling urban center with a population before the earthquake of approximately 3 million people, including the surrounding areas.The earthquake was devastating and more than twice as lethal as any previous magnitude 7.0 event [1].Precise totals will never be known, but current United Nations estimates are 250,000-300,000 deaths, which is more than twice that of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima at the end of World War II [2].In addition, there were 300,000 injuries and 245,000 buildings were destroyed (Figure 1), which rendered 1.5 million Haitians homeless, most of whom are now living in tent cities [1][2][3].Before the earthquake, Haiti was the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere and was ranked 149 on the 2009 Human Development Index [4].The existing health care system was tenuous, and the majority of Haitians did not have access to regular health services.Although the response from the international community was swift and massive, first responders were still placed in the unenviable position of having to ration medical care because the sheer magnitude of the tragedy outstripped available resources.Some facilities decided not to treat catastrophic injuries, such as spinal cord injuries (SCI), because of the resource intensive needs of these patients, perceived low survival rates, and "minimal chance of ultimate rehabilitation . .." [5].Nevertheless, despite the challenging circumstances, initial efforts led to the stabilization and survival of many individuals with injuries that would have likely been life-threatening in pre-earthquake Haiti.Before the earthquake, individuals living with severe SCIs were largely nonexistent in Haiti.Although the exact number and survival rate before the earthquake is unknown, the feeling among rehabilitation professionals with long-standing involvement in Haiti is that individual cases were sporadic and that persons with severe injuries, if they survived the initial injury and acute period, typically died within the first 1-2 years.This would be consistent with other developing nations.Under these circumstances, there was little need for expertise in the delivery of care to individuals with SCIs.Likewise, there were no true inpatient rehabilitation beds for individuals with SCI.The events of January 12 led to an unprecedented number of SCIs.A preliminary report by Handicap International estimated that there were more than 100 survivors with SCIs [6].The number is now thought to be closer to 150 despite the fact that most persons with cervical injuries did not survive.The situation was compounded by damage to medical facilities, for example, the General Hospital in Port-au-Prince.An undetermined number of persons with SCIs were transferred to facilities outside Haiti, including the United States.Given that acute care facilities were stretched beyond their capacity, an urgent need arose for patients to be discharged to alternative settings once stabilized.Under these difficult and dire circumstances, 3 organizations established SCI units to address this pressing need: Haiti Hospital Appeal (HHA) in Cap-Haitien (northern Haiti), Project Medishare/Univeristy of Miami in Port-au-Prince (central Haiti), and St. Boniface Hospital in Fond-des-Blancs (southern Haiti).Currently these facilities are caring for approximately 60 individuals with SCI.Two authors (A.S.B.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».