MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1995697317 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2004.0091

The Community within the Child: Integration of Indigenous Knowledge into First Nations Childcare Process and Practice

2004· article· en· W1995697317 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica Ball, Maureen Simpkins

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousGeneral partnershipTraditional knowledgeHead startEarly childhoodSociologyCommunity developmentWhite (mutation)Gender studiesEconomic growthPolitical sciencePublic relationsPsychologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

If children really know who they are, then they can go into white society. We teach them to be proud. The racism is not going to faze them. Instead of shaming, they're going to hold their head high. First Nations Partnership Program graduate, March 26, 2003 The training has taught me a lot about "who I am." I have culture and traditions. It's so important to teach kids at a young age their own traditions as well as the traditions of others. There are others in this world who are different. First Nations Partnership Program graduate, March 26, 2003 What does Indigenous knowledge mean in the evolving contexts of First Nations communities?1 How do Indigenous processes of knowing in both a traditional and modern sense become integrated into early childhood care and development programs? How does the incorporation of Indigenous knowledge in community programs such as childcare impact cultural identities at the level of individual members and the community as a whole? These questions were asked as part of a research study undertaken with twenty-seven First Nations early childhood development (ECD) graduates and thirty-one childcare administrators, parents, and community Elders from three diverse groups of communities in British Columbia (BC), Canada. This article describes the research and highlights some of the approaches taken by First Nations community members to understand [End Page 480] and work with Indigenous knowledge in community program development. Method Two university researchers traveled to each of the three groups of First Nations communities in rural areas of bc. Together they conducted free-flowing, conversational interviews with individuals and groups and also observed activities and materials in the childcare program operated by the participating First Nations. The interviews predominantly consisted of listening to accounts of how the interviewees saw culture as part of their own process and practice with young children. Both interviewers have extensive experience living and working with First Nations people but are not of First Nations heritage themselves. Our understandings and perceptions of the integration of Indigenous knowledge into early childhood education training and practice comes out of many hours spent discussing and researching these issues inside and outside of this project. Generative Curriculum Model In order to give context to this research it is important to begin by briefly describing the "Generative Curriculum Model" used in the unique training program for First Nations community members to become early childhood practitioners. In light of the research done within the First Nations Partnerships Programs (FNPP), this article will describe what community-specific or Indigenous knowledge looks like in terms of: (a) language and traditional activities; and (b) beliefs, values, and the involvement of Elders. Important impacts of this training program on individuals and the community include: (a) an apparent, community-wide perception of the childcare practitioners as leaders and as role models for youth, parents, other community members, and external service providers who visit the community; and (b) the emphasis placed on "knowing who you are" as a pivotal learning process during the training program, which then flowed into the childcare programs as knowledge passed on by the graduates and their stimulation in the children of the process of exploring [End Page 481] their identities and coming to "know who they are" within their extended family and community context. These findings raise important questions about knowledge that is "authentically" First Nations as opposed to "staged" or "add-on" curriculum.2 Background: First Nations Partnership Program The FNPP began in 1989 as a partnership between the University of Victoria's School of Child and Youth Care and the Meadow Lake Tribal Council (MLTC) in Saskatchewan. Since that time, nine more First Nations tribal organizations and communities in Saskatchewan and British Columbia have used this program to train community members in early childhood care and education in partnership with the University...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,202
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,402

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,019
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0020,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations29
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Indian QuarterlyMême sujetIndigenous and Place-Based EducationTravaux en français237 207