MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1995701233 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2013.0014

The Trouble with Magic: Conjuring the Past in New York City Parks

2013· article· en· W1995701233 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Zetta Elliott

Notice bibliographique

RevueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFantasyMagic realismPostmodernismMAGIC (telescope)White (mutation)RacismLiteratureInnocenceHistoryArtSociologyGender studiesPsychoanalysisPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Trouble with Magic: Conjuring the Past in New York City Parks Zetta Elliott (bio) The “trouble” with magic, as it is represented in much of children’s literature, is that it appears to exist in realms to which only certain children belong. If postmodern fantasy is characterized by “uncertainty, indeterminacy, and ambiguity” (Nikolajeva 154), then contemporary African American speculative fiction may be understood as using those particular features to respond to alienation, displacement, and distortion within American society and the field(s) of science fiction and fantasy. As Nancy Tolson observes, “Multicultural adolescent books found in most classrooms are historical fiction, realistic fiction, or nonfiction—reserving the luxury of fantasy for young white characters” (44). African Canadian speculative fiction author Nalo Hopkinson suspects that the publishing industry “was and is eroticizing black people as victims, as though that is our value to the world” (101–2). Walter Mosley concurs, yet adds that, “if black writers wanted to branch out past the realism of racism and race, they were curtailed by their own desire to document the crimes of America. A further deterrent was the white literary establishment’s desire for blacks to write about being black in a white world, a limitation imposed upon a limitation” (406). My own commitment to writing speculative fiction for young readers emerged directly from my childhood consumption of British fantasy novels by E. Nesbit and C. S. Lewis. My invisibility within those much-loved texts demanded that I “develop the capacity to dream myself into existence,” as I have expressed it elsewhere (“Decolonizing”), and as an adult I hoped to spare twenty-first-century Black children the complicated task of “decolonizing” their imaginations. Yet despite rapidly changing demographics in the USA and Canada, there is still an appalling lack of fantasy fiction for children of colour, leading one to question whether the genre can respond to and/or reflect the realities of marginalized children when the publishing industry seems to produce/practise/perpetuate exclusion. In this essay, I will examine the representation of [End Page 17] New York City parks as magical sites of discovery and recovery in speculative fiction for young readers. After considering the development of urban parks, I will elaborate on my project of “Afro-urban magic” and conclude by revisiting the books of Ruth Chew, which I first read as a child. According to Terence Young, the nineteenth-century rationale for urban parks was that they would promote “public health and prosperity” on the one hand and “social coherence and democratic equality” on the other (537), and although city park designers were initially concerned with serving men, they gradually incorporated the perceived needs of women, adolescents, and children. Young contends that urban park design, with its vision of “a universal sense of nature,” eventually gave way to a modernizing process of “spatial segmentation and specialization” (537). Consequently, park designers rejected the need for “generic spaces linked by a composed repetition of earth, water, and the same plant species throughout,” opting instead for greater variation in order to accentuate specific locations within the park, which were designed to serve specific groups (537). Speculative fiction for young readers has gone through a similar process of modernization, shifting—although far too slowly—from “universal” and “generic” narratives with repetitive features (witches, wizards, werewolves, and so on, derived from European folklore and fairy tales) to a sort of “specialization” that emphasizes the particular magical practices and histories of racially and ethnically diverse urban populations. It is insufficient, however, merely to insert characters of colour “into a traditional fantasy world of fairies, sprites, and Anglos” (Woo 253). A truly hybrid approach is required, the kind that Celestine Woo argues for in her consideration of the work of Laurence Yep: “In order for a story to be empowering to the Asian American child, it must grapple with the dual pulls of both Asian and American cultures, not imply the preferability of either” (253). In her twenty-nine novels, Ruth Chew uses green spaces like the Brooklyn Botanic Garden and Prospect Park to engage young readers in the exciting exploits of predominantly white, middle-class children. As a child growing up in suburban Toronto, I read...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,550
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207