SS: Hydrates: Experimental results for long term CO2 injection near methane hydrate formations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract CO2 has been focused for improving recovery factor of methane hydrate. The most of the principle is replacing guest molecular. It is also known that CO2 hydrate formation generates a large amount of exothermic heat. This heat can warm sediments up to 10 degrees Celsius as one of heating method. But a problem is how to inject CO2 at near fields of methane hydrate formations. CO2 hydrate formed in sediment blocks the pore of sediments. Then CO2 cannot inject into sediments for about ten-year term. But it is possible to inject CO2 for long term by a thermo-dynamic principle of the stability zone of CO2 hydrate. We will present experimental results to prove the principle of CO2 injection into formations. 1. Introduction Methane hydrate is solid, and it doesn't flush and flow from production well. Methane hydrate must be dissolved into gas and water in sediments by lowering the water pressure of the sediments or by heating the sediments to flow out from production well. Research consortium for methane hydrate resources in Japan succeeded to onshore depressurization test at permafrost in Canada for 6 days, and the consortium estimated the resources in the east part of Nankai trough[1]. The first trial of offshore test in Nankai trough is planed in 2012. On the other hand, CO2-enhanced oil recovery is commercialized by injecting CO2 into oil wells in the U.S. to enlarge oil production [2]. This method mitigates CO2 release into atmosphere. A research development is therefore necessary for an enhanced recovery of methane hydrate by using CO2. There is a problem of productivity by dropping of temperature for methane hydrate production by depressurization, because dissolving methane hydrate is endothermic reaction. It absorbs heat. Combining a heating method as an option to the depressurization to warm sediments, the productivity would be kept for long term. The recovery factor can also be expected to enlarge by the heating method. The productivity and the recovery factor are very important for commercialization of methane hydrate production. However, if we use fossil energy for the heating method, production rate, which is produced energy over input energy, become small. Then new technical developments are necessary for heating sediments for commercialization. We focused that CO2 hydrate formation is exothermic reaction, and we have proposed a heating method using heat of CO2 hydrate formation [4,5]. Sediments can be warmed up to 10 degrees Celsius when the pressure is more than or equal to 4.5 MPa to accelerate dissolving methane hydrate. CO2 works as heating energy of sediments in this case. Blockage of gas transportation pipeline cased by gas hydrate was reported in 1934. If CO2 is injected in to sediments, CO2 hydrate is formed and it blocks the pore of sediments in the same manner. Then CO2 can't inject into sediments. A subject for applying the heating method using exothermic heat of CO2 hydrate formation is to show a method to inject CO2 in to sediments continuously for long terms. The point of this method is using equilibrium state. No CO2 hydrate formation and dissolving are occurred. It balanced on the boundary of CO2 hydrate stability zone. Then the pore is kept opening for flow. Also the temperature of the formations is kept at 10 degrees Celsius by formation and dissolving of CO2 hydrate naturally. Then CO2 can inject into sediments continuously for long terms by using the equilibrium state. When the pressure is more than or equal to 4.5 MPa, the temperature of the equilibrium state is 10 degrees Celsius. In the following chapter, the principle of CO2 injection into formation continuously for long terms is verified by experiments are presented.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».