MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1996720111 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2011.0025

Oskar Panizza and The Love Council : A History of the Scandalous Play on Stage and in Court, with the Complete Text in English and a Biography of the Author (review)

2011· article· en· W1996720111 sur OpenAlex
Johannes Pankau

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueModern Drama · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePsychoanalysis and Social Critique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésoskarBiographyParanoiaPoliticsLawArtLife imprisonmentClassicsPrisonLiteratureHistoryArt historyPolitical sciencePsychologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Oskar Panizza and The Love Council: A History of the Scandalous Play on Stage and in Court, with the Complete Text in English and a Biography of the Author Johannes G. Pankau Peter D.G. Brown . Oskar Panizza and The Love Council: A History of the Scandalous Play on Stage and in Court, with the Complete Text in English and a Biography of the Author. Jefferson, NC / London: McFarland, 2010. Pp. 292, illustrated. $49.95 (Pb). Oskar Panizza, poet, journalist, and psychiatrist, who broke taboos, disobeyed religious and political authorities, and experimented with new artistic forms, was probably the "most brazen, provocative, outspoken and fearless" (12) writer of his time.1 Today, he is mostly known for his scandalous piece Das Liebeskonzil [The Love Council], whose publication resulted in a one-year prison sentence on charges of blasphemy and obscenity. During his prime in the 1890s, however, Bavarian-born Panizza was not merely regarded as an eccentric or psychopath (although that is how he self-identified sometimes) but valued as a creative personality in avant-garde and Bohemian circles. This was largely a consequence of his activities in the Gesellschaft fü r modernes Leben [Society for Modern Life], an authors' group founded in Munich in 1890. He was a friend of important figures such as Frank Wedekind, author of the Lulu dramas, and naturalist Max Halbe. Increasingly, Panizza suffered, however, from manifest paranoia and spent his last seventeen years, until his death in 1921, in different psychiatric clinics. This development resulted in the marginalization and neglect of Panizza's literary achievements, including his undoubtedly most important play, Das Liebeskonzil, which satirically discusses the emergence of syphilis at the Vatican court of Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia) at the end of the fifteenth century and depicts the Christian trinity in almost caricature-like distortion. Immediately after its publication in Zurich, the text was confiscated by legal authorities, who charged Panizza with blasphemy and pornography. It was not until 1967 that the play premiered in Paris, and even later it remained an object of legal contestation, such as when a film adaptation by Werner Schroeter was screened in Austria in the 1980s. The attempt to introduce Panizza to a wider English-speaking readership seems highly justified, especially at a time in which questions regarding the satirical depiction of religious phenomena and "political correctness" in general have acquired international significance. One of the few scholars to deal in depth with Panizza's work is Peter D.G. Brown, who, in 1983, [End Page 244] published one of the first serious studies on the subject. In 2005, Brown published the original manuscript and different versions of the The Love Council, as well as various materials on the play's production and reception histories, thus laying an essential foundation for further research. His new English translation of The Love Council, along with contextual materials, is superior to previous English versions because it is the first to be based on the 1893 manuscript of the play. Possessing profound knowledge of his source material, especially of the many linguistic peculiarities and irregularities of the author (apparent, for example, in Panizza's increasing use of sometimes bizarre orthographical forms), Brown has mastered the difficult task of translating the drama's text into comprehensible English, and, despite an inevitable degree of standardization, he still manages to preserve many of the characteristics of the original. The volume also includes a fairly detailed biography of the author as well as material on Panizza's trials and the worldwide reception and stage history of the play (with some photographs). Brown's edition reveals not only Panizza's personal eccentricities but also his polemic and artistic energy, which he used to protest manically against obscurantism, the Catholic Church and its followers, opportunism, sexual inhibitions, and a hypocritical bourgeoisie that he saw as concentrated in Munich. The edition also documents Panizza's attempt to overcome the traditional theatre, which he regarded as obsolete. In ways similar to those of Wedekind and early Brecht, he tried to do so by systematically integrating versatile forms, such as parody, satire, caricature, variety show, cabaret, vaudeville, and commedia dell'arte. Thanks to a skilful selection of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,828
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle