MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1996991530 · doi:10.1176/pn.37.6.0034

Personality Disorders Can Be More Disabling Than Depression

2002· article· en· W1996991530 sur OpenAlex
Joan Arehart-Treichel

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyPersonality disordersPersonalitySchizotypal personality disorderPsychiatryClinical psychologyBorderline personality disorderAvoidant personality disorderMajor depressive disorderMental healthDepression (economics)MoodSocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessPersonality Disorders Can Be More Disabling Than DepressionJoan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:15 Mar 2002https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.37.6.0034Which mental illnesses are most severe? A new study may surprise some people with its finding that certain personality disorders are even more impairing than major depression.The study was conducted by Andrew Skodol, M.D., a psychiatrist-researcher at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, and colleagues and was reported in the February American Journal of Psychiatry.More than 600 subjects with borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, avoidant personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, or major depressive disorder were included in the investigation. They were recruited from sites of the long-term Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study, which is being conducted with the participation of investigators from Brown University, Columbia University, Harvard University, Texas A&M University, and Yale University.The psychological and sociological functioning of these subjects was then assessed with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation. It included questions to evaluate functioning in employment, household duties, student work, and recreation; interpersonal relationships with parents, siblings, partners, and friends; and global functioning. Subjects also rated their own functioning using the Social Adjustment Scale. The researchers then tallied the results of these assessments for each of the five groups and compared results.Results from the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation indicated that persons with borderline personality disorder or schizotypal personality disorder were most impaired functionally; that individuals with avoidant-personality disorder were next; and that persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder or major depressive disorder were least so.The subjects’ own functional ratings using the Social Adjustment Scale gave similar results. Persons with schizotypal personality disorder or borderline personality disorder rated themselves as significantly more impaired in all individual domains of functioning and overall than did persons with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder or major depressive disorder. Individuals with avoidant personality disorder remained intermediate.In fact, persons with schizotypal personality disorder and borderline personality disorder had greater impairment on virtually every measure of impairment than did persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder or major depressive disorder regardless of whether the evaluation was interview based or by patient self-report.What’s more, these results remained statistically significant even when the investigators took into consideration possibly confounding factors such as age, gender, or minority status.“Our findings are especially noteworthy,” Skodol and his team wrote in their study report, “given the growing appreciation for the degree and persistence of limitations in functioning of patients with major depressive disorder. Impairment due to major depressive disorder has been found to be comparable with that of patients with chronic medical illnesses such as diabetes and arthritis.”In other words, although major depressive disorder is quite debilitating, borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, and avoidant personality disorder appear to be all the more so.Paul Links, M.D., is a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto in Canada. Since he is especially interested in personality disorders, Psychiatric News asked him whether he would comment on the study by Skodol and his team.The study, Links said, provides “an unparalleled opportunity to compare the functioning across subjects with severe, less-severe, and no personality disorders. As our clinical experience would suggest, patients with severe personality disorders—schizotypal and borderline—have greater impairments in all areas measured compared with subjects with no or less-severe personality disorders.”This report, however, “is just the first step,” he continued. “We need to have better methods of assessing functioning, including observational data. We need to understand the relationship between personality psychopathology and functioning. Finally, we need to examine how interventions affect functioning.”The investigation was financed by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and from the Borderline Personality Disorder Research Foundation.The study report, “Functional Impairment in Patients With Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, or Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder,” is posted on the Web at http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org under the February issue. ▪ Am J Psychiatry 2002 159 276 ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,327
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,314
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle