73 VITRIFICATION OF BOVINE OOCYTES: EFFECT OF PACKAGING AND EQUILIBRATION TIME ON NUCLEAR MATURATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The conservation of female animal genetics is challenging because of the scarcity of oocytes and their sensitivity to cryopreservation techniques. During slow, controlled freezing procedures, intracellular ice crystallization often leads to cell damage. Vitrification as an alternate method of cryopreservation exposes cells to a higher concentration of cryoprotectants with an ultra-rapid cooling rate, leading them to an ice-crystal-free, solid glasslike structure. The vitrification procedure has been used successfully for the cryopreservation of embryos and other body tissues, but very few reports of successful oocyte cryopreservation exist because of their complex structure. The present study was designed to compare two packaging methods (Cryotop v. 0.25-mL straw) and two equilibration times (10 v. 0 min) for vitrification of bovine oocytes. COC were aspirated from follicles <8 mm in diameter on bovine ovaries collected from a slaughterhouse. COC with =3 layers of cumulus cells and a uniform cytoplasm were selected, washed in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) + 5% calf serum (CS), and divided into five equal groups. In the control group, the COC were washed in TCM-199 + 5% CS and matured in vitro in TCM-199 containing 5% CS, 5 µg mL–1 of LH, 0.5 µg mL–1 of FSH, and 0.05 µg mL–1 of gentamicin at 38.5°C, 5% CO2, and high humidity for 22 h. In the treatment groups, half the COC were equilibrated with vitrification solution 1 [VS1: TCM-199, 7.5% ethylene glycol (EG), 7.5% DMSO, and 20% CS] for 10 min. After equilibration, COC were exposed to vitrification solution 2 (VS2: TCM-199, 15% EG, 15% DMSO, 20% CS, and 17.1% sucrose) for 30 s. The remaining half of the COC were directly exposed to VS2 without equilibration in VS1. Groups of five equilibrated or nonequilibrated COC were either loaded in a 0.25-mL straw or placed on Cryotop and plunged in liquid nitrogen. The COC were thawed by immersing straws and Cryotops into 37°C thawing solution (TCM-199, 20% CS, and 17.1% sucrose) for 1 min, and were washed and matured in vitro, as described above. After maturation, the COC were denuded using 0.3% hyaluronidase in Ca-Mg free DPBS and mounted on slides. The oocytes were fixed in ethanol:acetic acid (3:1) for 24 h, stained with aceto-orcein for 20 min, and evaluated for stage of maturation. The data (maturation rates) were analyzed using chi-square analysis. In the control group, 61% (n = 54) of the oocytes reached the metaphase-II (M-II) stage. In the treatment groups, more (P < 0.001) oocytes vitrified on Cryotops reached the M-II stage than those vitrified in straws (23.4%; n = 107 v. 9.4%; n = 116). The effect of equilibration time was not significant (P > 0.05) in either packaging method. In conclusion, vitrification of bovine oocytes using the Cryotop method provides an alternative for the cryopreservation of bovine oocytes. Moreover, bovine oocytes can be successfully vitrified without equilibration. This study was supported by the Canadian Animal Genetic Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».