Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Peter Flinsch: The Body in Question John Paul Ricco (bio) Ross Higgins . Peter Flinsch: The Body in Question. Arsenal Pulp. 174. $27.95 As might be expected, the convergence of male bodies, sexual desire, place, and speech that diagrams a politics of modern masculinity was all too acutely felt by a twenty-two-year-old member of the German Luftwaffe who, while at a military Christmas party in 1942, was caught kissing a subordinate male officer. Prosecuted for violating the German [End Page 452] penal code against homosexual acts, the young man is sentenced to the punishment of clearing the war field of landmines, having perhaps not so accidentally stepped on one marked 'homo-masculinity.' In many respects it is this event that will set in motion the life of Peter Flinsch and that grounds Ross Higgins's biographical narrative of this gay male artist who, for the past fifty-five years in Montreal, has created a vast archive of images of iconic male figures, from which are derived the over one hundred drawings - in various and often mixed media - that have been assembled in Peter Flinsch: The Body in Question. Born in Leipzig in 1920 to an upper-middle-class family, which included the art historian Ulrich Thieme (maternal grandfather, and founder of the authoritative, thirty-seven-volume artist's dictionary Thieme-Becker Künstler Lexikon), Flinsch grew up in a milieu of art scholarship and connoisseurship. After the war he moved to Paris and around 1952 to Vancouver, where, with his boyfriend, the dancer Heino Heiden, he founded the Vancouver Ballet. Two years later, Peter followed Heiden to Montreal, where for the next thirty years he worked as a set designer and artistic director for CBC television. Ross Higgins's introductory essay, based upon interviews with the artist over the past sixteen years, richly narrates Flinsch's life, one that has followed a dramatic course that is only hinted at by the few, albeit key, events mentioned above. The degree to which the figures of muscular and athletically fit male bodies in Flinsch's work function as icons of gay male desire is commensurate with the lack of details that would enable one to identify the specific sexually charged social spaces in which Flinsch encountered these bodies: the locker room and sauna of the YMCA, and the bars, bathhouses, gyms, and strip joints along St Catherine Street, in Montreal's 'Village.' Whether this is explained in terms of the equally iconic status of these places such that they need only be graphically hinted at, or by the artistic desire to privilege figure over ground, or even perhaps by the liberation from the need to envision backgrounds felt by an artist whose day job required him to design backdrops and sets for ballet, theatre, and television, nonetheless, this lack of contextual detail creates a curious tension between the work and Ross Higgins's discussion of it. For while Higgins, a professor of sexuality and anthropology at Concordia University, Montreal, author of De la clandestine a l'affirmation: pour une histoire de la communauté gaie montréalaise (1999), and an authority on the history of Montreal's gay culture, wishes to treat Flinsch's images as ethnographic visual documents of this history, the infinite recession of contextual details doesn't make Flinsch's works the most reliable guides of gay haunts. This is in no way to criticize either the artist or the writer, yet it does lead me to point to Flinsch's use of titles and declarative statements. Written right on the drawing's surface, these inscriptions can be [End Page 453] understood to exist between figure and ground, and to open up an interlocutory space that is one of the most distinct and sophisticated features of Flinsch's representation of the scenes of gay male culture. Witty puns and double entendres (plate 23 'Three Linemen with Stiff Cables'), alliteration (plate 68 'Just Testing Testicles'), and apostrophe (plate 103 'I Am the Answer to a Virgin's Prayer'), the titles not only linguistically play with their description of the subjects represented, but at times critically comment on the very form of the work (plate 59 the...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,056 | 0,023 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».