Mobility of Gas-in-Oil Dispersions in Enhanced Solution Gas Drive (Foamy Oil) Exploitation of Heavy Oil Reservoirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In the cold production of foamy heavy oil under solution gas drive, the oil and the released solution gas are believed to flow in the form of a gas-in-oil dispersion. The mobility of such a dispersion is an important issue in the mathematical modelling of the cold production process. However, very little factual information is available in the literature on the mobility of gas-inheavy oil dispersions. The objective of this work was to fill this gap in our knowledge of foamy oil flow behaviour by measuring the mobility of gas-in-heavy oil dispersions under varying conditions. A new apparatus was developed for measuring gas-in-oil dispersion mobility as a function of the dispersed gas fraction and the pressure gradient. It uses a sand-pack holder with three sections of different diameter to produce three different pressure gradients in the same flow test. An in-line mixer was used to generate live oil for producing the foamy dispersions. Several validation tests were conducted to check the equipment and procedures. Tests were carried out with a viscous mineral oil, as well as with a heavy crude oil. At a low gas fraction, such as would exist immediately below the bubble point pressure in the reservoir, the apparent viscosity of a gas-in-oil dispersion was higher than that of the live oil at the bubble point pressure. At high gas fractions, the apparent viscosity of the dispersion was lower than that of the live oil at the bubble point pressure. The boundary between low gas fraction and high gas fraction was in the 15% - 20% gas fraction range. Therefore, in the interval 0 to 15% - 20% gas fraction, the apparent viscosity increases with increasing gas fraction, and then at higher gas fractions, it decreases with increasing gas fraction. The apparent viscosity was also found to vary significantly with the pressure gradient; in general, increasing with increasing pressure gradient. In terms of the relative permeability, it was found that the oil relative permeability varied significantly with pressure gradient and displayed a value of higher than unity at an optimum combination of the values of the pressure gradient and fractional flow of oil. The gas relative permeability remained low in all tests. A comparison of the mineral oil tests with the crude oil tests showed that the two systems behaved similarly. Introduction "Cold production" is the term given to a successful, but as yet not fully understood, heavy oil production technology. The term "cold" emphasizes the fact that no reservoir heating is involved. It is essentially an improved form of primary production by solution gas drive that may also be termed enhanced solution gas drive. The improvement consists in the increase of recovery factors compared to conventional primary production and is induced by producing the (vertical) wells at very high rates. The most significant difference between the new technology and the conventional one lies in the attitude toward the sand influx into the production well.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».