MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999009260 · doi:10.3802/jgo.2009.20.4.213

KGOG's & KSGOC's Symposium, Nov. 12-13, 2009

2009· article· en· W1999009260 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hyun Hoon Chung

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Gynecologic Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineGynecologic oncologyClinical trialSession (web analytics)GynecologyOncologyFamily medicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) Symposium and Workshop has been held biannually in the spring and autumn. The 9th KGOG Symposium and Workshop was held in Seoul, November 12, 2009, and over 150 participants joined. The KGOG Symposium consisted of four Sessions; KGOG papers published, review lectures, special lecture and statistics. For the first session, two topics conducted by KGOG published in the peer-review journals were presented; KGOG-1010, about validation of vulvar cancer nomogram, and KGOG-3004, clinicopathologic characteristics of malignant germ cell tumors. Second session consisted of three review lectures; First lecture was on the revised FIGO staging for gynecologic cancers which was issued in May 2009. Second was the updates of GOG Surgical Manual, and the last was on the retrospective study for grouping intermediate risk factor in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA, protocol KGOG-1021. In this Symposium, professor Gavin C.E. Stuart from University of British Columbia was invited as a former chair of Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). He performed two lectures; What can you do within the scope of GCIG?, and clinical trials on epithelial ovarian cancer conducted by National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group (CTG). The first lecture was on the importance of conducting collaborative clinical trial in developing oncologic strategies. Second lecture focused on the development of protocols by NCIC CTG and the trial and error in conducting trials. The experiences of NCIC CTG may be an actual guide for KGOG in developing study protocols and conducting trials. Last session of Symposium was lecture on statistics by doctor Byung-Ho Nam from National Cancer Center, Korea; Clinical trial design with biomarkers. KGOG workshop was held in the afternoon, and the Workshop consisted of two parts; International protocols and KGOG protocols. A total of 6 protocols of international clinical trials were presented including GOG-0263, which was proposed by doctor Sang-young Ryu, and accepted as GOG protocol. GOG-0263 is a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant radiation versus chemoradiation in intermediate risk, stage I/IIA cervical cancer treated with initial radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, which is the first KGOG proposal accepted by GOG, and will be activated soon. Five KGOG protocols were presented briefly at the last session including KGOG-3019, development of Korean ovarian cancer prevention and control program through prospective multicenter patient-control study, and supported by government. There are currently 2 active phase II trials comparing the efficacy of chemotherapeutics in ovarian cancer; KGOG -3016 and KGOG-3017, and recruitment is ongoing as scheduled. The 15th Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy (KSGOC) Symposium was held in Seoul, November 13, 2009 following KGOG's Workshop and Symposium. Two invited speakers from Canada presented updated clinical trials and development of basic research in the gynecologic oncology field. The Symposium consisted of 4 sessions, and each session was composed in the form of presentation & discussion. The theme of first session was 'Recent advances in the treatment of gynecologic cancer'. In this session, topic on recent advances in the therapeutic HPV vaccine was presented. Professor Gavin C. E. Stuart from University of British Columbia gave 2 lectures; 'mTOR inhibitor application in endometrial cancer management', and 'Emerging first-line regimen for ovarian cancer patients after cytoreductive surgery'. In the first presentation, he showed the prospect and limitation of clinical application of mTOR inhibitor in endometrial cancer. Second presentation summarized the updated knowledge of various regimens as a first-line choice in patients with ovarian cancer followed by cytoreductive surgery. The second session was on the 'Novel molecular target therapy in ovarian cancer', and 3 topics were presented. Doctor Benjamin K. Tsang from University of Ottawa presented two lectures on the mechanism of chemoresistance in ovarian cancer; 'Non-gnomic action of p53: possible mechanisms of dysregulation in chemoresistance in ovarian cancer', and 'X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP): a potential therapeutic target for chemoresistance ovarian cancer'. In the first presentation, he showed evidence for p53-mediated apoptotic pathways important in the regulation of chemosensitivity and modulated by the PI3K Akt pathway in the conference of chemoresistance. In the second talk, XIAP was summarized as the promising molecular target for ovarian cancer treatment. The last topic of this session was 'Molecularly targeted chemotherapy using immunoconjugate in gynecologic cancer' presented by professor Jung-Won Lee. Luncheon seminar focused on the current opinions and the potential role of HPV vaccination presented. Session III, subtitled as 'How to publish a good paper in the international journal?' was prepared for the young investigators. Tips and talks on English writing and the methods of using various databases were summarized in this session. Last session was on the hot issues in the gynecologic oncology. First topic was the summary of gynecologic cancer session in ASCO 2009. In this talk, updated data and knowledge were systematically reviewed. The rest topics were the role of integrated molecular-anatomic imaging in cervical cancer, and the role of autophage with chemotherapeutics in ovarian cancer. The 2010 KGOG Symposium & Workshop is scheduled for April 29, 2010 and KSGOC Scientific Meeting for April 30, 2010 in Jeju, Korea.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,403
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Gynecologic OncologyMême sujetOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentTravaux en français237 207