MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999233384 · doi:10.1353/uni.0.0469

Crossover Fiction: Global and Historical Perspectives , and: The Crossover Novel: Contemporary Children’s Fiction and Its Adult Readership (review)

2009· article· en· W1999233384 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. E. McGee

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œLion and the unicorn · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAudience measurementSurpriseFantasyMainstreamWhite (mutation)Harry potterLiteratureHistorySisterPhenomenonArt historyMedia studiesArtSociologyPhilosophyLawTheologyPolitical scienceAnthropology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Crossover Fiction: Global and Historical Perspectives, and: The Crossover Novel: Contemporary Children’s Fiction and Its Adult Readership Chris McGee (bio) Sandra L. Beckett. Crossover Fiction: Global and Historical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2009. Rachel Falconer. The Crossover Novel: Contemporary Children’s Fiction and Its Adult Readership. New York: Routledge, 2009. Both of these two new studies on the phenomenon of so-called “crossover” fiction open with discussions of Harry Potter, something that should surprise almost no one. If there is any series that has, rightly or wrongly, been credited with seismic shifts in how children’s books get marketed and who exactly reads them it is certainly the Harry Potter books. Beckett notes how Rowling’s first novel is often thought of as “the crossover title, a kind of prototype of the genre” (1, emphasis in original). Falconer recalls first encountering it when her sister handed her a “paperback she had picked up in an airport shop on her way to India . . . a gloomy-looking book, with a black and white photo of a steam train approaching through fog on the cover” (1). From this simple book there quickly followed, she recalls, “an extraordinary period in which children’s literature exploded into the mainstream of popular and literary culture. Suddenly everyone was talking about children’s books, and not just Harry Potter, not just fantasy, but children’s fiction in all its variety and invention” (1). For Both Beckett and Falconer, the Harry Potter books represent the most recognizable example of the current crossover phenomenon: books read by both child and adult audiences; books consciously targeted to multiple demographics; authors who turn from writing adult fiction to writing children’s novels, or vice versa. As Beckett simply describes it, “Crossover fiction blurs the borderline between two traditionally separate readerships: children and adults” (3), something the Harry Potter books accomplished in seemingly unprecedented ways. If there is any single thing that connects both Beckett and Falconer’s books, however, it is that there are precedents for Harry Potter, that there is in fact a deeper history and broader perspective to this phenomenon than often gets acknowledged. Whereas Beckett attempts to place this phenomenon not only in a historical but also a global context, Falconer sets out to consider some of the more cultural and theoretical causes behind it. In that sense alone these two books complement each other especially well and are well worth recommending to anyone interested in the topic. [End Page 397] Beckett organizes her book around the broad categories that make up different types of crossover fiction and proceeds to work through as many examples as she can. There are lengthy chapters on so-called Adult-to-Child fiction (adult novels that are read by children and adolescents, including such standards as Gulliver’s Travels, A Christmas Carol, or The Time Machine), and Child-to-Adult fiction (children’s books read avidly by adults, including Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy, or books with cult followings such as Winnie-the-Pooh, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, or C. S. Lewis’s Narnia books). The most significant strength of Beckett’s book, however, is her scope. Beckett devotes significant portions of her book to authors and titles from a global perspective, including authors (both well known and lesser known) from Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Canada, Japan, Brazil, Norway, Ireland, Scotland, India, South Africa, Australia, Poland, the Netherlands, and the Ukraine, to name just a few. As a resource for titles, authors, and publishers, the book seems invaluable. Beckett notes, to take but one example, the publishing imprint Las Tres Edades from the Spanish publishing house Siruela, dedicated to the idea that “age boundaries are very artificial, and that certain texts are suitable for everyone” (197), and which publishes books aimed at simultaneous audiences of children and adults. In her opening, Beckett writes that “Crossover literature is generally seen as a new trend” (1), an idea she sets out to discredit by the sheer weight of examples to the contrary. She points out that crossover fiction was a vibrant phenomenon of the nineteenth century, in particular, and in earlier centuries if we consider books such as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,903
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,666

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œLion and the unicornMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207