MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999407323 · doi:10.1353/ctr.0.0038

Performing Self and Society Through Improvisation: The Improvisation, Community, and Social Practice Project

2010· article· en· W1999407323 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Rob Wallace

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Theatre Review · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImprovisationAestheticsPower (physics)SociologyArtPoliticsPsychologyVisual artsLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Performing Self and Society Through Improvisation: The Improvisation, Community, and Social Practice Project1 Rob Wallace (bio) The historical connections between improvisation and theatre, however we define either of those terms, are long and complex. And while actors, dramatists, and theatre scholars (most notably Keith Johnstone) have long theorized on the benefits and disadvantages of improvisation, the relevance or understanding of what might be involved in improvisation has remained relatively murky over the centuries. As in musical improvisation, improvisation in theatre has historically connoted an ambiguous talent: the ability to deceive and simultaneously reveal the potentially immoral and unethical character of an actor. Stephen Greenblatt unpacks such a view of improvisation in his provocative article entitled “Improvisation and Power,” wherein he defines “improvisation” as [t]he ability to both capitalize on the unforeseen and transform given materials into one’s own scenario. The “spur of the moment” quality of improvisation is not as critical here as the opportunistic grasp of that which seems fixed and established. Indeed, as Castiglione and others in the Renaissance well understood, the impromptu character of an improvisation is itself often a calculated mask, the product of careful preparation. (60) Yet such careful preparation here leads to control, manipulation, and subterfuge. Greenblatt’s improvisation becomes an essential mode of Early Modern domination, wherein characters like Shakespeare’s Iago exhibit “Europeans’ ability again and again to insinuate themselves into the preexisting political, religious, even psychic, structures...and to turn those structures to their advantage” (60). Improvisation has had many different and equally powerful trajectories in the course of the past five hundred–plus years of imperial machinations. It is the potential for improvisation to build new forms of community, to create new forms of social change that can operate in opposition to or beyond such Iago-like manipulation—on or off-stage—that the Improvisation, Community, and Social Practice (ICASP) initiative seeks to study. ICASP is a research project directed by Dr. Ajay Heble (professor at the School of English and Theatre Studies at the University of Guelph), and is a multi-campus research initiative funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Bringing together scholars and community partners across North America, Europe, and Australia, “the project’s core hypothesis is that musical improvisation is a crucial model for political, cultural, and ethical dialogue and action” (ICASP). While the ICASP initiative stems from Dr. Heble’s own involvement in improvised music scholarship and promotion (through his work as Artistic Director of the Guelph Jazz Festival) in addition to other project members’ music-based work, the research team is committed to engaging improvisation from a broad range of perspectives. Participants therefore include scholars from a wide variety of disciplines, including literature, drama, ethnomusicology, law, sociology, anthropology, philosophy, and social policy. Theatre Studies scholars involved in the project include Dr. Ric Knowles and Dr. Daniel Fischlin (School of English and Theatre Studies, University of Guelph), [End Page 89] Dr. Keith Sawyer (Department of Education, Washington University), and the 2009–10 ICASP postdoctoral researcher based at the University of Guelph, Dr. Rebecca Caines. As the project’s website describes, “In addition to public discourse and scholarly publication, [ICASP] highlights collaboration with arts presenters, educators, and policy makers to ensure the broadest possible impact on Canadian society.” ICASP was formally launched in 2007, creating a rush of scholarly activity, community partnership, and artistic energy that continues to grow. Each year the project hosts academic colloquia located in Guelph, Montreal, and Vancouver, along with periodic symposia, lectures, and reading groups connected to the University of Guelph, McGill, the University of British Columbia, and Université de Montréal; work from these events has subsequently been featured in the peer-reviewed online journal connected to the project, Critical Studies in Improvisation/Études critique en improvisation. Topics considered range from improvisation in sports, improvisation and gender, and the relationship between legal discourse and improvisation. Another unique ICASP focus is the biennial Summer Institute for graduate students, which enables students to interact with pre-eminent scholars in a two-week session of seminars, lectures, informal meetings, and workshops on critical improvisation studies. The project has also worked with community organizations such as Montreal...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,086

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0190,057
Communication savante0,0160,014
Science ouverte0,0030,020
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Theatre ReviewMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207