Annual International Space Environment Service Meeting held at Space Weather Week
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The International Space Environment Service (ISES) held its annual meeting in Broomfield, Colo., on 3 April 2005, just prior to the start of the Space Environment Center's Space Weather Week conference. The purpose of the ISES is to encourage and facilitate near-real-time international monitoring and prediction of the space environment by the rapid exchange of space environment information; the standardization of the methodology for space environment observations and data reduction; the uniform publication of observations and statistics in an accepted format; and the application of standardized space environment products and services to assist users in reducing the impact of space weather on activities of human interest. Meeting highlights involved discussion of current activities occurring in the Federations of Astronomical and Geophysical Data Analysis Services, the International Year of Planet Earth, the International Polar Year, the Electronic Geophysical Year, and the International Heliophysical Year. ISES has much of its heritage over the last 50 years rooted in activities supporting the International Geophysical Year from 1957, and intends to repeat that support for these incipient programs to occur in the next few years. Other discussions during the annual meeting revolved around a variety of important topics. For example, solar cycle 23 is now declining and many questions on the predicted magnitude of solar cycle 24 are coming in to the operational centers. ISES needs to work on its prediction for cycle 24. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a long-standing group that does many of the things for terrestrial weather that ISES does for space weather—Is there an opportunity to merge space weather and terrestrial weather in the WMO? The Earth Observing System (EOS) and the Global Earth Observing System of Systems (GEOSS), each in their formulation stages, advertise better cooperation among member nations to share data and observations. ISES may have a strong contribution to make to each of these prominent programs. A special action, approved by a unanimous voice vote, established an ISES grant to provide travel support for forecasters visiting other ISES centers. This grant was named the “Gary Heckman Fellowship,” after a longtime, valued participant in ISES as a representative of the United States, who died in 2003. Other significant activities at the meeting were a demonstration of a software program allowing Internet-based communication worldwide among the forecasting centers. The experimental exchange software is called “Project Forum.” Other presentations included the draft 2006 World Days Calendar, a discussion of the potential to exchange white light coronagraph data from the NASA Stereo mission, and the move of the ISES Web site host from Boulder to Ottawa on 23 March 2005. David Boteler, the ISES director and a researcher from Natural Resources Canada, presided over the meeting. ISES members from the Regional Warning Centers of Canada, Poland, Australia, Belgium, India, Japan, Russia, and the United States were in attendance. Reports from the absent centers (China, Sweden, Czech Republic, and France) were received and entered into the minutes of the meeting (for membership locations, see Figure 1). In addition, the European Space Agency was also represented. The next annual meeting is scheduled to be held in conjunction with the International Council for Science's Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) 36th Scientific Assembly in Beijing in July 2006. More information on the ISES may be found at http://www.ises-spaceweather.org/index.html. Joseph Kunches is chief of the Forecast and Analysis Branch at the NOAA Space Environment Center, Boulder, Colorado.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».