MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999585426 · doi:10.1080/07036337.2011.584344

Europeanization Through Law, Compliance, and Party Differences – The ECJ’s ‘Rüffert’ Judgment (C-346/06) and Amendments to Public Procurement Laws in German Federal States

2012· article· en· W1999585426 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of European Integration · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean Union Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesDirectorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Mots-clésProcurementLawGermanPolitical scienceDirectiveEconomicsManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In comparing the amendments to public procurement laws after the ECJ's 'Rüffert' judgment (European Court of Justice 2008, C-346/06) the paper explores the compliance to Europeanization through law in the 16 German federal states. Instead of unilinear convergence, three types of reactions were identified. First, conservative-liberal governments rescinded the respective regulation. Thus, they dismantled their policy. Second, conservative governments that were susceptible to the pressures from small- and medium-sized business associations absorbed the effects of the ECJ ruling by enacting quick and minor amendments. Third, social democrat led governments tended to seek out policy alternatives that were consistent with European law. These governments engaged in EU-induced policy expansion, eventually setting up new procurement laws that included a number of social and environmental standards. Therefore, the case study at hand confirms studies of Europeanization that highlight the re-assertion of party differences which depends on both fundamental programmatic differences as well as plurality of European law. Key Words: Europeanizationfederal statespolitical party differencespublic procurement lawposted workers directive Acknowledgement I am grateful to the Hans Böckler Foundation which provided funding for this research project. I thank also Nicole de Cuir, Andreas Hänlein, Rolf Jordan and the two anonymous reviewers of the journal for their helpful comments. Notes 1. Lower Saxony's (Niedersachsen) procurement law stated that companies, who bid for works contracts, are required at the time of tendering to declare in writing that they will remunerate the employees engaged in the work with at least the wage rate agreed to in the applicable collective agreement. The 'Rüffert' judgment dealt with a case in which the contractor engaged to build a correctional facility had agreed to comply with these obligations. However, the then hired Polish subcontractor paid its employees on the job-site merely 47 per cent of the wage rate required in the collective agreement. A penalty for breach of contract in the amount of 85 000€ was leveled against the contractor for violation of the contract compliance obligations after termination of the works contract. The Higher Regional Court of Celle (OLG) submitted the case to the ECJ in a request for a reference for a preliminary ruling. 2. An attempt in 2002 to implement contract compliance regulation at the national level failed due to objections from the German Federal Council (Bundesrat). 3. According to data from the Institute for Employment Research's (IAB) Establishment Panel the amount of West German companies covered by collectively negotiated wage rates sank from 53 per cent to 39 per cent between 1998 and 2007 compared with a decrease of 33 per cent to 24 per cent in East German firms (Bispinck and Schulten Citation2009, 203). 4. As of June 2006 the following generally binding minimum wages applied in the construction industry: 8.90€ in the East German states compared to 10.30€ in the West German states. 5. It has to be taken into account that the SPD also retained a calculated option for forming a coalition with the CDU. 6. The Hamburg 'case' was subject to a specific sort of dynamic. Contract compliance regulation was pushed through by the opposition fraction during a time, in January/February 2004, when the former CDU–FDP–Schill party coalition was in the process of dissolving. The final proposal for the introduction of procurement legislation was drafted and implemented by the opposition parties of the SPD and GAL (The Green Alternative List) together with a few representatives from the Law and Order Offensive Party. 7. It should be clarified that this paragraph focuses on the German debate in which the judgement is perceived as a cause for actions taken. It does not depict the general discussion of the ECJ's restrictive interpretation of the Posted Workers Directive in the line of the Viking, Laval, and Rüffert decisions (Deakin Citation2008; Joerges and Rödl Citation2009; Kilpatrick Citation2009). 8. For instance, contract compliance and minimum wages were subordinated to fair trade, ILO Core Labour Standards, equality of treatment of the genders and educational quotas. 9. This was codified in the Act against Restraints on Competition (GWB), as amended in 2009, and which serves as the relevant material basis for procurement law with reference to the above mentioned European directives: 'Additional demands can be made of the contractor regarding the performance of a contract, in particular these requirements can pertain to social, environmental and innovation-related aspects' (Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen 2010. 97 no. 4). 10. For example, this refers here to the International Labour Organization's (ILO) Conventions on Forced Labour, Child Labour, Non-discrimination and the Principle of the freedom of association.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,732
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,347

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,101
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle