MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999591595 · doi:10.2118/07-04-05

A Simple Kinetic Model for Coke Combustion During an In-Situ Combustion (ISC) Process

2007· article· en· W1999591595 sur OpenAlexafffund
Yan Jiao Ren, N. P. Freitag, Nader Mahinpey

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiquePetroleum Processing and Analysis
Établissements canadiensSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)University of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesPetroleum Technology Research Centre
Mots-clésCombustionChemistryCokeGravimetric analysisThermogravimetric analysisReaction rateIsothermal processDecompositionThermal decompositionChemical engineeringThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Although coke combustion studies have long been conducted, the literature is still lacking an accurate understanding of reaction kinetics. To this end, the thermo-oxidative behaviours of Neilburg oil and its asphaltene fraction were examined in the presence of core sand. Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed in a flowing atmosphere at the heating rate of 10 °C/min up to 750 °C. Both nitrogen and air were used at a flow rate of 45 ml/min in the experiments. As earlier researchers have observed, at least two main regions of reactions were identified by the thermo gravimetric (TG) and derivative thermo gravimetric (DTG) thermo grams. Various effects, including distillation, low-temperature oxidation (LTO), thermal cracking, middle-temperature oxidation (MTO), high-temperature oxidation (HTO) or combustion, and even mineral decomposition, were observed. In this study, Neilburg oil and asphaltenes were completely cracked in a nitrogen atmosphere at 425 ° C to produce coke. Subsequently, the fresh coke was subjected to isothermal combustion at several temperatures from 374 °C to 519 °C. A two-step oxidation reaction model was applied to describe this combustion process. The chemical reactions were simplified into two oxidations occurring in series. In the first reaction, coke was partially oxidized to form an intermediate product, which was then burned in the second reaction. Based on the TGA data, kinetic parameters were estimated with the aid of custom written software. For comparison, the one-step oxidation reaction model was also employed to predict the combustion process. The two-step oxidation reaction model gave a better fit to the experimental data. It was also confirmed that the coke derived from the Neilburg asphaltenes is reasonably representative of the coke derived from the whole oil. Introduction It has long been recognized that in situ combustion (ISC) might be a potentially effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique, particularly suitable for medium and heavy crude oil-bearing reservoirs, as well as for steam depleted reservoirs. However, the fact that the fundamental reaction mechanisms of the ISC process have not been completely understood makes its field performance prediction unreliable. It is generally believed that there are three major reactions during an ISC process: thermal cracking, low temperature oxidation (LTO) and high temperature oxidation (HTO). Thermal cracking of crude oil, including visbreaking and coking, produces a solid residue on the surface of the reservoir sand grains. The solid residue, or so-called coke, is consumed as the fuel for combustion. LTO reactions, which are typically heterogeneous reactions between the gas and condensed phases, involve the formation of oxygenated hydrocarbons. During an ISC process, LTO is possible if oxygen is present ahead of the combustion front, either due to the oxygen flux being relatively high or due to bypassing of the front by some of the injected oxygen(1). HTO is the heterogeneous (gas-solid) reactions that consume the coke deposited by thermal cracking to produce carbon oxides and water. Some efforts to investigate the oxidation reaction mechanisms during ISC can be found in the literature. An early extensive study was carried out by Dart et al.(2) who tested the combustion rate for oxidation of carbonaceous residues on clay catalyst pellets.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,290
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,914

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations38
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetPetroleum Processing and AnalysisTravaux en français237 207