MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999669431 · doi:10.1353/tech.0.0325

Across the Borders: Financing the World’s Railways in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (review)

2009· article· en· W1999669431 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfred C. Mierzejewski

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueTransport and Economic Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)Competition (biology)AssertionCapital (architecture)Economic historyInvestment (military)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Across the Borders: Financing the World’s Railways in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Alfred C. Mierzejewski (bio) Across the Borders: Financing the World’s Railways in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Edited by Ralf Roth and Günter Dinhobl. Aldershot, Hants., and Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. xxxviii+323. £55. Railroads have enjoyed a revival over the last quarter-century, and railroad history has experienced renewed interest as a result. The volume under consideration in this review is a collection of papers delivered at the first meeting of the International Railway History Association. Its theme is international direct investment in railway enterprises; in their introduction, editors Ralf Roth and Günter Dinhobl claim that this is a forgotten area of historical analysis. Considering that the contributions are overwhelmingly [End Page 708] based on secondary literature, some of it very well known, that assertion cannot be sustained. The editors also make other, very ambitious claims concerning the supreme importance of transportation history and the railway as a transnational communications network in the nineteenth century. The global financial crisis raging as this review is written, combined with the railroads’ need of constant capital inputs for renewal of assets, undermines the first contention. Technical incompatibilities, tariffs, and competition among domestic systems, even when owned by governments, refute the second claim. In addition, as Konrad Jarausch has pointed out, the transnational concept is not well defined. Of the eighteen chapters, seven merit the attention of the reader not versed in the literature. The contribution by Francisco de los Cobos Arteaga and Tomás Martinez Vara on investment in Spanish railways in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, based on primary sources, shows how government subsidies provided incentives to private, mostly foreign investors, to reap profits from railway construction projects. Actual railway operation was a losing proposition. This is a clear case of building ahead of demand in response to government incentives, a phenomenon familiar to those who have looked at the Union Pacific example in the United States. Many of the lines built under this program were subsequently dismantled. Augustus Veenendaal provides two useful chapters, one concerning Dutch foreign investment in railways and the other on foreign investment in U.S. lines. The former provides a good summary of his Slow Train to Paradise (1995) while the latter offers an excellent overview of the extensive extant literature. These two chapters make clear the high risk involved in foreign investment, the need for intermediaries familiar with the target market, and the long time-horizons necessary for railway investors. As Mira Wilkins made clear decades ago, even what became the world’s largest economy was heavily dependent on foreign sources of capital for its development. Diane K. Drummond provides a very helpful summary of the literature concerning British foreign railway investment in the nineteenth century. She demonstrates that the most important obstacle in this area of research is the lack of contemporary records, making it impossible to measure accurately both investment volumes and returns. She does provide data for the situation just before World War I that helps clarify matters. Ian J. Kerr contributes a well-written, interesting vignette about the Great Indian Peninsular Railway, showing how a single enthusiastic individual could exert considerable influence on a major project. Robert Lee provides new information using primary sources concerning French investment in Chinese railways in the late nineteenth century. Here we see a politically motivated project earn substantial returns in an economically underdeveloped region. Maria Teresa Ribeiro de Oliveira, despite using a narrow source base of Brazilian law collections, employs Douglass North’s concepts of institutions [End Page 709] and path dependency to provide an illuminating discussion of the development of railways in Brazil during the nineteenth century. She, too, demonstrates how government subsidies tied to line construction led to the misallocation of resources, causing significant opportunity costs for the general economy. As is always the case in such collections, the quality of the components varies widely. Excessive claims for the importance of railroad and, more generally, transportation history can only discredit the field. This aside, some of the contributions to Across the Borders are worth reading because they provide useful introductions to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTechnology and CultureMême sujetTransport and Economic PoliciesTravaux en français237 207