MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999729020 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181a3f4e7

External Skin Expansion

2009· letter· en· W1999729020 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Bell

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2009
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSurgical Sutures and Adhesives
Établissements canadiensOttawa Public Health
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBlistersTraction (geology)Tension (geology)Materials scienceSurgeryComposite materialMedicineEngineeringMechanical engineeringCompression (physics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir: I was delighted to read the article by Daya and Nair confirming the concept of external skin expansion.1 I have been working on this principle for 8 years with engineers from Canica Design, Inc. (Almonte, Ontario, Canada), developing products to accomplish wound closure and presurgical external skin expansion in a safe and reliable way. There are two complications one may encounter in the skin with tape application under tension. The first is blistering from the shear forces at the skin adhesive junction.2 These blisters are painful and can cause scarring. Reinforced strips do not stretch, which means that when they are adhered under tension, all of the force on the tape is transferred to the skin beneath the strip. The skin is no longer compliant, as it is bonded to the reinforced fabric. The skin right at the end of the strip suffers the highest load. The second problem is pain. Dr. Dal Cin describes expanding the skin to close an 8-cm skin graft on a scalp with dynamic external forces over a period of 149 days. The patient lost enthusiasm at several points along the way because of discomfort. However, with the adjustable features of dynamic traction, gently stretching the scalp, the graft was excised and primary closure achieved.2,3 The Canica Design solution has been to simply use an elastomer between two strips of Micropore tape (3M, St. Paul, Minn.). This provides gentle relentless traction on the skin. The level of tension is set initially by a limiter controlling the stretch of the elastomer, which protects even the most easily damaged skin (e.g., leg ulcers in diabetics and in irradiated skin). Similarly, this mechanism of controlled tensioning reduces pain. It is noninvasive, repeatable, and very easily applied. The product is called DynaClose. It is licensed for wound closure and is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for surgical skin expansion. It is approved in Canada for both uses. We believe this product offers benefits similar to the technique described by Daya and Nair in prestretching skin but will avoid the problems of skin irritation, breakdown, and pain. This is achieved by controlled elastic forces. As Daya and Nair state, the use of the external traction principle has many potential applications4–6: prestretching skin before surgical reconstruction, pain relief, and scar reduction. The Canica DynaClose tape can also be used in open wounds, which can be viewed directly through the transparent silicone sheeting, so that any infectious process would be directly evident (Fig. 1). This principle of dynamic closure is invaluable in closing unclosable wounds nonsurgically. DynaClose is the latest and simplest of the Canica family of Dynamic Wound Closure devices, which are well documented in the literature.7–10Fig. 1.: This fasciotomy was primarily controlled by DynaClose tape to prevent excessive retraction. The tapes were changed weekly to achieve delayed primary closure by 5 weeks, with no secondary intervention required. (Above) Photograph obtained on July 9, 2007. (Center and below) Photographs obtained on April 23, 2008.With my evident conflict of interest as a paid design consultant for Canica Design, I cannot participate in a valid study of these products, but I would encourage others to assess the benefits of this newly available technology in an objective fashion. Michael S. G. Bell, M.D. Plastic, Reconstructive, Cosmetic Surgery and Laser Resurfacing 1919 Riverside Drive, Suite 402 Ottawa, Ontario K1H 1A2, Canada [email protected]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,628
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryMême sujetSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesTravaux en français237 207