MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999927082 · doi:10.1891/1062-8061.18.167

Looking Closely: Material and Visual Approaches to the Nurse’s Uniform

2010· article· en· W1999927082 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNursing History Review · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Établissements canadiensMusée de la Civilisation
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCollarFront (military)ArtVisual artsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I start by looking at a rare and remarkably complete uniform that belonged to Edna Muir while she was a student at Montreal's Western Hospital School for Nurses in 1917 (Figures 1 and 2). Her ankle-length dress buttons up center-front, with long sleeves and V-neck. The fabric is blue cotton, soft from repeated washing, and printed with the entwined initials of the hospital-WHM. Let us follow Miss Muir as she dons her uniform. First she inserts the heavily starched collar carefully into the neckline of the dress. She reaches behind her neck to attach the collar to the back of the dress with a stud. She also studs the tabs together at the front of the collar, but this is not sufficient to keep the collar in place, so she draws long tapes attached to the collar tabs over her bosom and ties them at the back of her waist. No matter how carefully it is placed, the starched collar is going to chafe her neck. Next she puts on her cumbersome bib, with shoulder straps that cross over the back, secured with pins to a separate waistband underneath her apron. The center front of the bib is pleated at the top and held in place with a pin. Her dress is worn thin around the shoulders from the rubbing of the starched bib. Miss Muir will now have to stand erect lest she crease the bib! Next, she puts on her apron, attached with a stud at the back, then her starched cuffs, closed with studs, and finally, her cap, the crown of which she has carefully folded into box pleats and sewn into place. The brim at the back is worn, patched, and full of pin marks where she has inserted hat pins to keep her cap on her head. Now let us look at the photographic portrait of Miss Muir. Her hair is neatly parted in the middle and pulled over her ears into a bun at the back. Her spectacles and expression give her a serious and demure demeanor. Her uniform is immaculate and precisely arranged. Her stiff bib stands out from her upper body and her rounded cap sticks up above her head. Taken together, this object and image form a discourse about nursing in the early twentieth century. Nursing uniforms were practical, symbolic, and active in creating patterns of behavior, attitudes, and values that defined generations of nurses for just over one hundred years. The uniform was a major strategy in introducing nursing reform and also in creating a strong sense of identity for hundreds of thousands of women. I am fascinated with this remarkable outfit. For those of us born before nurses began to don scrubs, this was just how they looked; the look was naturalized, not questioned. Yet the combination of soft dress, cardboard-stiff overgarments, and pop-up cap is perplexing: How did it come to be? My study of this integral aspect of nursing combines contextual information on the history of nursing with my long interest in dress to write a cultural history of the nurse's uniform. The purpose of this article, however, is not primarily to present the results of my research but rather to explore the methodology I have found useful, with emphasis on rich visual and material evidence for our understanding of labor, social, and women's history, in particular that of a significant female occupational group. This article presents my interpretation of the uniform using an analogy to the photographic process. When you take a photograph, you frame your subject (the nurse's uniform); you focus the lens (your questions); you decide on depth of field (moving back and forth from the artifact to the historical context); you search for the best exposure (uncovering meanings); and finally, you develop the film (the whole picture). Very little was written explicitly about the nurse's uniform during its formative period. Therefore, photographs and artifacts are the salient sources. They are powerful conduits to assumptions and beliefs that are so taken-forgranted that they are not expressed in words. Images of graduating nurses are compelling; they bring us face to face with the experience of nurse training. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,960
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,576

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,133
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle