Abstract P6-08-11: Count us, know us, join us global survey: Comparing the feelings and needs of advanced breast cancer patients in the United States with patients in Latin America, Europe, and Asia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Advanced breast cancer (stage III and stage IV/metastatic) (ABC) is the most serious form of breast cancer, with nearly 250,000 people across the globe living with the disease. Because ABC often metastasizes to the brain, bone, or liver, it has important health implications, requires life-long treatment, and is usually fatal. Support needs for this patient group are unique, yet rarely met. Hoping to identify new approaches to meeting the needs of this community, a global survey was commissioned by Novartis Oncology in partnership with the global advocacy community. Method: Harris Interactive conducted an online survey between October 2012 and March 2013. It was completed by 1,273 female metastatic breast cancer patients ages 21+ from 12 countries (United States [US], Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, United Kingdom, Germany, Russia, India, Lebanon, Taiwan, and Hong Kong). Total sample data are not weighted and are representative only of the individuals surveyed. A global post-weight was applied to ensure that all countries received an equal weight in the global and regional data. Results: Patients in the US (70%) are more likely than patients in most other countries surveyed to feel isolated from the non-metastatic community (40% globally). In addition, US patients (73%) are significantly more likely than their counterparts in most other countries to often feel that no one understands what they are going through (63% globally). Patients in the US (53%) are also more likely than those in most other countries to say that support from friends and family has diminished since their initial advanced diagnosis (41% globally), and employed US patients (34%) are more likely than those in many other countries to believe their colleagues look at them differently as a result of their metastatic breast cancer (17% globally). Women in the US were most likely to be actively seeking information (97%) compared with patients in other countries (77% globally). Although more US women patients are active information seekers, they are most likely to be unsatisfied with the information that is currently available compared to patients in the other countries (31%; 51% globally). Conclusions: Despite the significant amount of attention paid to breast cancer in the US and the resources available, many US women with metastatic breast cancer feel more alone and isolated than do their counterparts in most other countries surveyed. These US women are also significantly more likely than their counterparts in other countries to often feel as though no one understands what they are going through. More needs to be done to help women in the US feel supported emotionally throughout their entire ABC journey. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-08-11.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».