P3‐405: The effect of vignette activity on the neuropsychiatric behaviours expressed by individuals with dementia, living in long‐term Care
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Currently 500,000 individuals in Canada are living with dementia with a predicted increase to 1-1.3 million by 2035. Related care costs are expected to be 872 billion dollars by 2038. The prevalence of dementia in Canadian nursing homes was 45.4% in 2008. The greatest contributors to cost and challenges for caregivers are neuropsychiatric behaviors. Current pharmaceutical approaches demonstrate only modest success and clinical significance is questioned. Antipsychotics and anxiolytics used in severe cases may produce serious side effects and their limited modification of neuropsychiatric behaviors has led to severe use restrictions. The relationship between activity and neuropsychiatric behaviors in normal participants demonstrates a relationship between a sense of well-being and the opportunity to engage in autonomous activity. The absence of autonomy may lead to depression, agitation and aggression. Engagement in autonomous activity is severely restricted in locked nursing home units where meal times, sleep times and activities are highly programmed. It is proposed that this restriction creates a potential for increased agitation, aggression or apathy. Lawton, Cohen-Mansfield, Wilson and Hartig have clearly established the ability of the environment to impact behavior for both normal and dementia residents. Living in a nursing home where ‘going outside’ is prevented by locks; where diminishing cognitive ability reduces independence in activities of daily living; and where objects for interaction are limited by safety concerns, results in normal experiences of engagement, exploration and autonomy being seriously limited. Individuals with dementia living in a nursing home have been found to spend between 65%-85% of their time doing nothing. Further, 45% of individuals with dementia living in a nursing home receive little or no facility activities; 20% receive occasional activities and while 12 % received daily activities, those activities were deemed inappropriate for functional level and stated interests. It is during unoccupied time that most residents display neuropsychiatric behaviors. Impoverished environments contribute to the neuropsychiatric behavior that is expressed by those living with dementia in institutions. Objective: To identify the effect of resident interactions at a garden vignette, (a cluster of objects designed to both attract attention encourage self-determined activity interaction and exploration) on neuropsychiatric behaviors observed in individuals suffering with dementia, living in long-term care settings. Hypothesis: Time spent in activity at a garden vignette would be associated with a decrease in the frequency of neuropsychiatric behaviors and a decrease in medication used to control behavior. This study used a quasi-experimental within-subjects repeated measures block design to examine both intra-individual (within-subjects) and time-effect changes in behavior. The sample included 28 residents living on two special care nursing units who had been resident on the unit for a minimum of 4 weeks, had an MMSE score of 18 or less, or GDS/FAST stage of 4,5,6, or 7 with a minimum of one documented difficult to manage behavior e.g. agitation/aggression, depression /dysphoria, apathy/indifference. Excluded were all residents dependent on others for mobility and those with uncontrolled pain. Behavior measures included the Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Nursing Home, Single Question Depression Test, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, the Ryden Aggression Scale 2 and the Apathy Inventory. Exposure to the garden vignette was for 14 days followed by a 14-day washout period with each phase being repeated once. Behavior measurement occurred at baseline before vignette insertion and the second week of both the vignette intervention and washout phases. The process remained the same for the repeated intervention and washout phases. Video recordings 24/7 of interactions at the vignette noted: time of day, length of stay, objects interacted with, whether came by self or assisted, and level ofengagement. Chart audit identified age, gender, diagnosis, previous occupation, hobbies and interests, medications, current neuropsychiatric behaviors. Data analysis examines time effect in both control and intervention phases. Relationships between medication use, previous occupation, level of dementia, self-determined engagement and previous interests and hobbies will also be examined. Results are currently not available as data collection is in process. Data and analysis are expected to be complete by May 30, 2011. As this research is the thesis for PhD completion, results will be subjected to crtitical analysis by the PhD committee. Conclusions will not be drawn until data collection is complete.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,036 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».