MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2000632951 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2011.0051

“How Wonderful to Die for What You Love”: Mrs. Havelock Ellis’s Love-Acre (1914) as Spiritual Autobiography

2011· article· en· W2000632951 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jo‐Ann Wallace

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyWifeLiteratureMeaning (existential)LesbianArt historyPoliticsArtHistoryPhilosophySociologyLawTheologyGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

“How Wonderful to Die for What You Love”:Mrs. Havelock Ellis’s Love-Acre (1914) as Spiritual Autobiography Jo-Ann Wallace (bio) This paper explores the question of spiritual self-representation in the last novel, Love-Acre: An Idyl in Two Worlds (1914), of the now little-discussed writer Edith Ellis (née Lees, 1861–1916). Better remembered today as the lesbian wife of sexologist Havelock Ellis, she was a significant and well-known figure in her own right. She was active in progressive social and political associations in London; she put the simple living credo of the later nineteenth century into practice by operating her own farm for ten years in Cornwall; she wrote essays, novels, short stories, and biographies (most of them published under her married name, Mrs. Havelock Ellis); and she completed two extensive lecture tours in the United States. Following her death, Havelock Ellis attempted to manage her posthumous reputation by issuing anthologies of her work and by devoting his own autobiography, My Life (1940), to a detailed examination of their marriage. Edith Ellis herself never spoke openly about her longings or her lesbian relationships, and since Havelock destroyed most of her letters and other private papers after completing his autobiography, we must look to her fiction and lectures for evidence of her self-understanding. Her final novel is her most extended attempt to find a form and language to express the spiritual meaning of her life as an “invert.” As I will discuss below, she does this by combining realism and fantasy and by drawing on several traditions to embrace the figure of the scapegoat, the fool of God, and the willing self-sacrifice. The result is an unusual novel: not entirely successful, but heartfelt and even heartbreaking. Drawing on elements of her own life, on the commitments of late nineteenth-century progressive idealism, and on a variety of established and alternative religious traditions, Edith Ellis fashioned an innovative form of spiritual autobiography. In what follows, I offer a brief outline of the novel before sketching in some of the socio-cultural background necessary to understanding her experiment in self-representation. Love-Acre Love-Acre relates the life of Tobias Trewidden, a Cornishman, from his childhood to his early death from consumption at age thirty-one. Tobias’s life history is divided into seven allegorically named parts, each but the last representing a different stage in his development: “The Psychic,” “The Shepherd,” “The Lover,” [End Page 137] “The Alien,” “The Dreamer,” “The Outcast,” “The Pilgrim,” “The Woman.” The novel also has a highly allegorical prologue and epilogue in which little seeds of light (presumably souls) are blown from Love-Acre to World-Acre and back again. The sensitive and visionary Tobias is born prematurely to the gentle Mary, who dies within three weeks of his birth; shortly afterwards, his abusive father remarries, to a woman as coarse as himself. Only Leah, the family servant, harbours soft feelings for the child, who loses himself in a partly imaginary world of insect fairies, a world that is a presentiment of Love-Acre, a higher stage of existence. At seventeen, Tobias secures work as a shepherd, and the isolation of his role brings him closer to the “great secrets” of nature, including his own “threefold nature” wherein his fate or destiny lies: “in Tobias Trewidden was hidden … the man, the woman and the child entombed in his little sensitive body” (63). This period of his life ends when he meets, falls quickly in love with, and is betrothed to Loveday Cocking, a pretty and materialistic village girl whose unworthiness is apparent to the reader though not to the idealistic Tobias. At Loveday’s urging, Tobias abandons shepherding to find employment as “a head grocer” in the village, nicely outfitted in “a new suit and a bowler hat” (129). He soon runs afoul of Albert Tremayne, Loveday’s erstwhile suitor, and is goaded into a fight at the local tavern. It is clear that Loveday’s already wavering affections are further undermined by this event, and, partly as a result of his injuries and partly due to his loss of faith in Loveday, Tobias falls into a coma. He...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,291
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesTravaux en français237 207