In Thought and Action: The Enigmatic Life of S. I. Hayakawa by Gerald W. Haslam (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: In Thought and Action: The Enigmatic Life of S. I. Hayakawa by Gerald W. Haslam Frank Bergon In Thought and Action: The Enigmatic Life of S. I. Hayakawa. By Gerald W. Haslam with Janice E. Haslam. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011. 427 pages, $26.95. Gerald Haslam is entering his fifth decade of publishing novels, essays, stories, monographs, and anthologies as the primary interpreter of California in the context of the American West. In book-length studies and collections like Workin’ Man Blues: Country Music in California (1999) and Haslam’s Valley (2005), he has brought to national awareness the distinctiveness of California’s Great Central Valley as “California’s Heartland” and “The Other California.” These designations are embedded in two of his titles, California’s Great Central Valley: California’s Heartland (1993)—still after twenty years the best photographic chronicle of the Central Valley—and The Other California: The Great Central Valley in Life and Letters (1990, expanded 1994)—a book like no other in its definition of California’s western rural and small-town experience and literature, works I would nominate as required reading for anyone aspiring to membership in the Western Literature Association. Readers of this journal may recall a few years ago how twenty scholars and writers of western literature were called upon to address the question, “Is California Part of the West?” Properly asked to provide the definitive overview was the acknowledged expert about California in relation to the West, fiction writer and scholar Haslam, who, with his wife, Janice Haslam, wrote the introductory essay to that special issue. Now this former WLA president and recipient of the association’s Distinguished Achievement Award, again with his wife, has moved into the genre of biography with In Thought and Action: The Enigmatic Life of S. I. Hayakawa, the birth-to-death chronicle of a controversial California public figure. Named after Samuel Johnson, England’s eighteenth-century lexicographer and behemoth man of letters, Samuel Ichiye Hayakawa was born a Canadian Nisei in a Vancouver ghetto and grew up, racially but not culturally Japanese, in Calgary and Winnipeg. In Haslam’s words, Hayakawa was “a typical boy of the Canadian prairie,” and, in Hayakawa’s own words, he was “already determined to be a writer,” although he pursued a PhD in English, “in case,” he said, “I couldn’t make a living as a poet” (18, 29, 37). As a grad student at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Hayakawa published verse in Poetry and scholarship in PMLA, sparked his future wife with a lecture on “The Waste Land,” founded a university literary magazine, and staged the first American production of T. S. Eliot’s Murder in the Cathedral. As a young instructor, in response to the rise of Hitler in the 1930s, he grew interested in general semantics as a way of understanding how language works in spawning propaganda and racial hatred. In 1939, he wrote his [End Page 415] own mimeographed, spiral-bound freshman English textbook as (in his words) “a political act, asserting my belief in a rational society as opposed to a Nazi society where people go crazy over slogans, incantation, and torchlight marches” (117). Used by other young instructors at Wisconsin, including the burgeoning western novelist Wallace Stegner, this work in progress became a Book-of-the-Month-Club selection, titled in later revised editions Language in Thought and Action (1949), a best-selling textbook that put Hayakawa’s face on the cover of magazines and launched him onto the lecture circuit as a popular speaker. African American poet Gwendolyn Brooks said, “S. I. Hayakawa was a great liberal,” and, indeed, he was, until he changed (364). A battler for civil rights and the equality of minorities, a longtime columnist for the important African American newspaper The Chicago Defender, a leftist maverick in the co-op movement, “interested,” he said, “in reforming the capitalist system,” a de facto socialist who empathized with Watts rioters and claimed that the civil rights revolution wasn’t a Communist plot but contrarily “the result of a capitalist plot on the part of General Motors, General Electric, and General Foods, aimed at all of us,” Hayakawa...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».