MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2001552339 · doi:10.4043/23936-ms

Performance Characteristics of Surface Protection Coating Systems for Offshore Structures Under Arctic Conditions

2013· article· en· W2001552339 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andreas W. Momber, Michael Irmer

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArcticCoatingEnvironmental scienceIcingSubmarine pipelineCorrosionMarine engineeringMaterials scienceMeteorologyEngineeringMetallurgyComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringGeologyOceanography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Eight organic coating systems have been investigated according to their performance under Arctic offshore conditions. Three performance groups were considered: corrosion protection performance, performance under mechanical loads, and de-icing performance. The investigations involved the following tests: accelerated corrosion protection/ageing testing, anti-icing tests, tests for coating and ice adhesion, impact resistance tests, hardness measurements, and wettability tests. The test conditions were adapted to Arctic offshore conditions, which mainly covered low temperatures down to -60°C, dry-wet cycles, and UV radiation. Testing facilities for icing/de-icing performance tests have been developed. Standard offshore tests for corrosion protection assessment were partly modified. The coating systems investigated were organic coating systems which differed in generic coating material, number of layers, dry film thickness and application method. The first part of the paper reports about experimental design, the test methodologies, and test facilities used. The second part discusses the results of the investigations. Based on an assessment scheme, a ranking of coating systems is recommended regarding their protection performance under Arctic offshore conditions. The investigations are part of a nationally funded Cluster Project " POLAR?? (Production, Operation and Living in Arctic Regions). 1.0 Introduction Oil and gas exploration in Arctic regions is a future scenario for energy delivery. Due to changes in climate, inaccessible areas become accessible for exploration, drilling and production devices. In due of this development, a number of challenges will be faced, mainly caused by the harsh environment. The environment is characterized by violent wind, high waves, very low air temperatures, and ice, rime and snow. The latter issues, in particular, will have effects on the performance of surface protection systems. It is known that steel corrosion will not be accelerated in low-temperature sea water (Melchers, 2002), although the water may show increased oxygen contents. It is not an increase in corrosivity, but rather the question how surface protective coatings will respond to the harsh environment, that will determine the performance of organic coatings. This would specifically include the following items:–corrosion protection capacity;–response to mechanical loads;–icing and de-icing behavior. In terms of corrosion protection capacity, the low air temperature may be a special challenge to the coatings. Temperatures as low as -60 °C can be expected in Arctic regions. Standard testing scenarios for offshore coatings (ISO 20340, NORSOK M-501) request air temperatures up to −20 °C only, and it is not known how organic coatings may perform at lower temperatures. The response to mechanical loads can be related to low temperatures, too. It can be assumed that the response of organic materials may change from plastic response to elastic, or elastic-plastic, response (Hainsworth and Kilgallon, 2008), and to higher rigidity modules at low temperatures (Murase and Nanishi, 1985). This would, among others, induce a susceptibility to cracking (Bjoergum et al., 2011). Mechanical near-surface parameters, like scratch hardness, are also affected at low temperatures (Hainsworth and Kilgallon, 2008). These modification aspects are also considerable for the entire system " substrate-coating??, which may react in a modified way if exposed to very low temperatures. A parameter that would describe this response is the adhesion between substrate and coating. Icing and de-icing are crucial processes in terms of efficiency and safety of offshore structures (ISO 12949, 2001; ISO 19906, 2010; Ryerson, 2010). ISO 12949 (2001) distinguished between two types of atmospheric ice: glace and rime, whereby the formation of either ice type depends mainly on air temperature and wind speed. Glace is caused by freezing rain; it features a high density (900 kg/m3) and rather strong adhesion/cohesion strength numbers. Rime typically forms due to in-cloud icing; it has a moderate density, and it is usually vane-shaped. On offshore platforms, either type of ice may be found. Examples are shown in Fig. 1. Although active icing prevention strategies, such as heating, are powerful, they cannot be used elsewhere on a platform. Passive icing prevention in terms of anti-icing coating surfaces is a very attractive alternative. The same is true for anti-icing. Active methods, such as vibrations, heating or mechanical scraping, could be replaced or supported through coating surfaces that provide a weak adhesion to adhering ice (Antonini et al., 2011).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,651
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOffshore Technology ConferenceMême sujetOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesTravaux en français237 207