MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2001979721 · doi:10.2118/2009-064

A New Model for Reservoirs with Discrete Fracture System

2009· article· en· W2001979721 sur OpenAlex
Fanhua Zeng, Gang Zhao

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPetroleum engineeringGeologyFracture (geology)Computer scienceGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Dual-porosity and dual-permeability naturally fractured reservoir models assume that the fractures in the reservoir are connected with each other and distributed uniformly. However, in some cases, the reservoir characteristics exhibits discrete fracture systems, which means that the fractures might be unconnected and their distribution is not uniform. In this work, a new computational model is developed to compute the transient pressure behavior for reservoirs with discrete fracture system. This computational model is based on Laplace transform. The fluid flow in the fracture system and reservoir are computed separately and flux and pressure equivalent conditions in Laplace space are applied in the fracture wall to couple the fluid flow in both systems. The results suggest that the pressure response in a reservoir with a discrete fracture system has three flow regions: fluid flow nearby the wellbore, fracture-dominated fluid flow and fluid flow beyond the fracture. The fracture orientation (i.e. the distance between the fracture and the well), fracture parameters (fracture conductivity and non-Darcy effects) and fracture distribution are the main factors affecting the pressure response. In some particular situations the fracture-dominated fluid flow region in the pressure derivative curve may present two villages, which has been met in some field cases. The model provides with a tool for identifying the fracture pattern in a specific reservoir. Also, this model can be applied for optimization design of tight gas reservoir development. Introduction Classically, the fractured reservoir is modeled with Dual porosity model(1) or dual-permeability model. Those models assume that the fractures are connected with each other and distributed uniformly. The dual-porosity model also assumes that the fluid is produced from the fractures which are intersected with the well. However, in some cases, the reservoir characteristics exhibit discrete fracture system, which means that the fractures may be unconnected and their distribution is not uniform. Such kind of reservoir system was illustrated by Gao et al.(2), as shown in Figure 1. Gao et al.(2), also pointed out that the chance for a vertical well to intersect a discrete natural fracture is extremely small, since natural fractures in a reservoir tends to be vertical. Another type of discrete fracture system is artificial fracture system in tight gas reservoirs. To obtain economical production rate, most of wells in a tight gas reservoir are hydraulically fractured. Therefore, the whole reservoir looks like an artificial discrete fracture system. In this work, it is assumed that the discrete fracture system has the following characteristics,The fractures in the reservoir are discrete and not connected with each other;Each fracture can be described with its orientation, geometry and diffusivity;The well is not intersected with any fracture; and, 4. The fluid flow in fracture system obeys Forchheimer equation and the fluid flow in matrix system is Darcy flow. Zeng and Zhao(3) presented a model for non-Darcy flow in hydraulic fractures. For a reservoir with only one fracture existed, if the fracture is close enough to the well, then the system is similar to the system with a hydraulically fracture well.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,969
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle