MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2002080276 · doi:10.1111/epi.12466

Commentary on the 1st International Summer School for Neuropathology and Epilepsy Surgery (<scp>INES</scp> 2013) held in Erlangen, Germany, September 16–20, 2013

2014· article· en· W2002080276 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ingmar Blümcke, Roland Coras

Notice bibliographique

RevueEpilepsia · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEpilepsy research and treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeuropathologyEpilepsyNeurosurgeryEpilepsy surgeryMedicineNeurologyPsychiatryPsychologyDiseasePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Epilepsy surgery is increasingly available as a successful treatment option in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies when associated with distinct brain lesions. Reliable neuropathologic work-up of epilepsy-associated brain lesions represents, therefore, an important diagnostic tool in clinical epileptology, and the International League Against Epilepsy's international classification of epilepsies recognizes a large spectrum of neuropathologic substrates as potential predictors of each patient's disease progression and treatment response. However, histopathologic standards are not yet available for all different lesions encountered in patients with epilepsy, nor are they very well accepted or disseminated among the diagnostic pathology community. In addition, the microscopic diagnosis of epilepsy-related surgical brain specimens remains challenging due to the broad spectrum of disease variants. The European Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE-CEA) launched a first neuropathology teaching course aimed at colleagues who are engaged in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Thirty-seven colleagues from 25 nations participated at this first INES summer school in Erlangen, Germany (Fig. 1A). Most participants had a medical training record in pathology or neuropathology, although some had their background also in neurology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, neuropsychology, or neurosciences. This multidisciplinary group composition fostered fruitful discussions during the week that were considered most helpful to appreciate the value but also limitations of histopathology diagnosis in epilepsy surgery. The group was trained during 5 days by six distinguished tutors (Dr. Eleonora Aronica, Amsterdam; Dr. Albert Becker, Bonn; Dr. Ingmar Blumcke, Erlangen; Dr. Hajime Miyata, Akita; Dr. Harvey Sarnat, Calgary; and Dr. Maria Thom, London). Each tutor mentored his/her own group of six to seven students, helping them to microscopically review and discuss a series of 112 glass slides obtained from 31 surgical specimens selected to cover the large spectrum of epilepsy-related brain lesions and their variants, that is, the new ILAE classification of hippocampal sclerosis (first day), epileptic encephalitis and vascular disorders (second day), long-term epilepsy–associated brain tumors (third day), and the ILAE classification of focal cortical dysplasia as well as other malformations of cortical development (fourth and fifth days). This valuable series of histopathologic glass slides was prepared by the course organizers in Erlangen to offer each student free access to microscopic review and to familiarize with helpful and recommended special stainings, including a large panel of immunohistochemistry. All information was made available also by a special course booklet summarizing case presentation, protocols for neuropathologic workup in epilepsy surgery, as well as several histopathologic review articles introducing all major entities of epileptogenic brain lesions. We also invited distinguished speakers experienced in the field of clinical epileptology (Dr. Eugen Trinka, Salzburg; Dr. Christian Bien, Bielefeld; Dr. Karl Rössler, Erlangen; Dr. Hans Holthausen, Vogtareuth; and Dr. Fernando Cendes, Campinas), who always started the day's teaching program with a topic-related plenary lecture introducing the principles of adult or childhood epileptology, modern imaging techniques, or neurosurgical procedures. In addition to these practical teaching sessions, the interdisciplinary discussion and training environment in the microscope lecture room offered an encouraging spirit to foster clinical and scientific interest in the field of surgical neuropathology. The students' evaluation achieved exceptional rating scales, which support the course's structure with enough room and space for face-to-face teaching, as well as group discussions during case presentation and plenary lectures. Not to forget, our social events were very well anticipated and regarded helpful for building professional networks. Scholarships were made available from the International Society of Neuropathology (ISN, Fig. 1C) and International Brain Research Organization (IBRO, Fig. 1B), which allowed also participants from low-income countries to attend this course. CEA-ILEA support will be available also for next year's second INES in Erlangen. The dates will be announced on the course website at www.epilepsie-register.de or available at personal request from the course director ([email protected]). Both faculty and participants were confident that this course was most helpful to train in this rapidly emerging discipline with its new diagnostic classification schemes and many still ill-defined disease categories, covering a huge spectrum of brain malformations, inflammatory disease, degeneration, and tumors. Looking forward to meeting you next year in Erlangen! None of the authors have any conflicts to declare. INES 2013 was financially supported by ILAE-CEA (Commission on European Affairs of the Intl League against Epilepsy), IBRO (International Brain Research Organization), ISN (International Society of Neuropathology) and Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH (Mannheim, Germany). I confirm that I have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,053

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,031
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,003
Communication savante0,0030,005
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0350,040
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEpilepsiaMême sujetEpilepsy research and treatmentTravaux en français237 207