MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2002196073 · doi:10.1353/utq.2005.0021

Mauro in America: An Italian Artist Visits the New World (review)

2004· article· en· W2002196073 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachael Z. DeLue

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeArtHistoryArt historyHumanitiesLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Mauro in America: An Italian Artist Visits the New World Rachael Ziady DeLue (bio) Mimi Cazort. Mauro in America: An Italian Artist Visits the New World Yale University Press. viii, 160. US $26.00 'A most delicious day in the New World': so the Italian artist Mauro Gandolfi described his rambles in Schuylkill, near Philadelphia, during his extended stay in the United States in 1816. This phrase epitomizes the tone of Mauro's account of his travels, 'Voyage to the United States,' penned six years later in 1822 and here transcribed and translated by Antonia Reiner Franklin and Mimi Cazort, and introduced by Cazort. By turns exuberant and perplexed, Mauro's rich narrative captures the voyager's enthusiastic immersion in an exotic world - one, according to Mauro, replete with strange customs (some admirable, some not) and fascinating scenery (natural, but also man-made - Mauro is fascinated by the ingenuity of the New World's builders and engineers), and populated by honest, humble, egalitarian-minded citizens. From descriptions of Independence Day celebrations to New York oyster vendors, steamboat travel to public urination, the electoral process to the labour of slaves, Mauro offers up a wide-ranging vision of a culture seen through the eyes of an outsider and, in so doing, provides an unconventional and revealing lens through which to see the history of the young American republic. As Cazort says in her thorough and illuminating introduction, the artist-traveller's manuscript might be compared to other outsider narratives - Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America (1835-40), for example - but differs from these in its relative inattention to matters of politics and governance. Mauro is enamoured of the American democratic system - he attributes the virtuousness of the American people to just such a system - but where de Tocqueville is a political philosopher and social scientist, Mauro is a naturalist, closely observing and compiling his observations so as to create, in textual form, a kind of curiosity cabinet for the delectation of his readers. One of the pleasures of reading Mauro's text - and it is a wonderful read - comes from peering over his shoulder at the specimens - Quakers, shop windows, sycamores, stage actors - he has gathered and arrayed. One of the first things Mauro describes in the 'Voyage' is the marine life he observed during his passage to the New World, and he does so at length; indeed, some of the most meticulously articulated sections of the narrative are those dedicated to descriptions of New World flora and fauna. In Philadelphia, we find Mauro at the museum of natural history operated by the American artist Charles Willson Peale, and the Italian compares Peale's collection to the curiosity cabinets of Europe. Given Mauro's interest in natural history and his awareness of natural history collections on his home continent, it might not be too far-fetched to suggest that he intended his narrative to approximate the function of just such a collection. Indeed, the organization of the text - short sections on a variety of topics butting up against one another - approximates, for the reader, the experience of [End Page 433] moving through an early nineteenth-century collection or cabinet, going from one display case or vitrine to the next (or from one section of text to another), observing and imbibing knowledge along the way. The interest and significance of Mauro's narrative is manifold. Historians of American culture and art will find Mauro's first-hand descriptions of early American society (from political debate to popular entertainment) and of nascent art academies and markets immensely interesting and useful, and those interested in Italian history and culture or transatlantic studies will find this newly available text informative and compelling. If Cazort is to be faulted for anything in her undertaking, it would be her too eager ascription of objectivity to Mauro, what in her introduction she calls his spontaneous, authentic, unpremeditated, and pure observational mode. There is a quality of spontaneity to the text; yet, given that it was written several years after Mauro's trip and that the trip itself was stimulated and framed by personal and professional fortunes and compulsions, one imagines that a certain amount of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→Travaux en français237 207→