MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2002369845 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2007.0020

2006 VanArsdel Prize Essay "Cheap, Healthful Literature": The Strand Magazine, Fictions of Crime, and Purified Reading Communities

2007· article· en· W2002369845 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)IdeologyAnecdotePublishingPoliticsLiteratureSociologyMedia studiesHistoryLawArtPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

2006 VanArsdel Prize Essay "Cheap, Healthful Literature":The Strand Magazine, Fictions of Crime, and Purified Reading Communities Christopher Pittard (bio) At the turn of the twentieth century, Arthur Conan Doyle took a trip to the Continent. He later wrote of his journey in a letter to the literary editor of The Strand Magazine, remarking that "Foreigners used to recognise the English by their check suits. I think they will soon learn to do it by their Strand Magazines. Everybody on the Channel boat, except the man at the wheel, was clutching one."2 Publishing historians have usually taken Doyle's anecdote to reveal the extent to which George Newnes's periodical the Strand had established a firm reading community, and expanded that community to include a sense of nationhood.3 Such a concept of the reading community has become crucial to recent developments in the study of Victorian periodicals and serial fiction.4 The idea is a development of the work of Stanley Fish on "interpretive communities," being a set of readers who bring certain "interpretive strategies" to bear on a text, and in terms of periodical history the idea is seen as a more useful critical tool than the more general conception of the "reading public."5 Kate Jackson, for instance, argues that the creation of reading communities, defined as "categories of readers linked together by a common experience or expectation of reading, and by common social, political, ideological or cultural objectives or bonds rather than by physical proximity," was at the heart of Newnes's publishing enterprise. The continued success of magazines like the miscellany Tit-Bits (1881) was, according to Jackson, due to Newnes's creation of a relationship between himself as paternal editor and the readership of the magazine.6 In this article, I consider how the format of the Strand itself "purified" experience, particularly in the supposedly threatening realm of crime narratives. The first number of the Strand Magazine was launched by George Newnes for Christmas 1890 (the first volume being dated 1891), after [End Page 1] he had perceived a gap in the market for a monthly which would reflect the interests of an aspirational middle class through a wide range of fiction, interviews, articles, and illustrations, sold mostly at railway station stands to catch a market of city commuters. Yet Newnes was also aware of the potential for his publications to improve his readers' cultural health, arguing that "An enormous class of superficial readers, who crave for light reading, would read the so-called sporting papers if there was no Tit-Bits to entertain them. At least its contents are wholesome and many of those readers may be led to take an interest in higher forms of literature."7 Tit-Bits was wholesome because of what it was not; The Strand, by contrast, would be a positive effort to offer healthy reading. Of Tit-Bits, Newnes said that in an 1893 interview that "it is a great source of satisfaction to me that I should have inaugurated a popular paper which should be taken largely by the masses, and which is absolutely pure."8 Newnes might well have been talking of one of the proprietary medicines frequently advertised in the pages of illustrated newspapers such as the Illustrated London News, and the same concerns were voiced in the first number of the Strand, with Newnes offering "cheap, healthful literature."9 Not high art, but hygienic for its reader-consumers. Newnes continually described his publications in the context of the health of his readers; the term he used most frequently to describe his periodicals was "wholesome," and its various synonyms.10 The emphasis on community in Newnes's publications (and critical discussion of them) suggests another form of purification. For the sociologist Richard Sennett, the creation of community implies a certain purifying instinct, and to develop this he analyses a social formation he terms "purified community." This structure arises out of an individual's adolescent identity crisis, which is resolved by the adoption of a purifying drive which gives precedence to the ordered over the disordered and painful: [E]xperience over the course of time is subjected to a purification process, so that the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,856
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,915

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle