MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2002371645 · doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01778.x

Third nerve palsy following intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for bilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration

2009· letter· en· W2002371645 sur OpenAlexaff
Jonathan A. Micieli, P.Y. Santiago, Michael H. Brent

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Ophthalmologica · 2009
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Établissements canadiensToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMacular degenerationRanibizumabBevacizumabOphthalmologyPtosisAdverse effectSurgeryInternal medicineChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editor, Despite the dramatic therapeutic effect of anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD), concerns still linger regarding the potential for adverse events. Among its important physiological roles, VEGF maintains the microcirculation (Baffert et al. 2006; Papadopoulou et al. 2009) and protects neurons in the adaptive response to ischemic injury (Nishijima et al. 2007), which may be compromised by repeated intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents. Previous reports have documented suspected adverse systemic events including a sixth nerve palsy (Park & Guy 2007) and early loss of pregnancy following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Petrou et al. 2009). Here, we describe a patient who developed a microvascular third nerve palsy after multiple injections of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for NV-AMD. A 64 -year-old man with bilateral NV-AMD presented to the emergency room late at night with a marked reduction in adduction and elevation as well as ptosis of the right eye that were not initially documented earlier in the day by a general ophthalmologist or a family physician with whom the patient visited after waking up feeling dizzy and confused. In the ER, his pupils were reactive to light, there were no visual field cuts on confrontation test, optic disc margins were distinct, and there was no note of proptosis. CT angiogram revealed no evidence of any abnormalities of the major cerebral vessels, and a subsequent MRI scan showed no evidence of infarction and no abnormalities on the T2-weighted series. The patient’s past medical history includes 13 intravitreal bevacizumab injections in the right eye (last injection 16 days prior to incident) and seven injections of intravitreal bevacizumab followed by six ranibizumab injections in the left eye (last injection 14 days prior to incident). The patient’s medications also include candesartan for hypertension with which he takes faithfully (his blood pressure was measured to be 127/88 and 129/84 on two monthly visits for injection) and rabeprazole for gastroesophageal reflux. No other systemic conditions were reported. Follow-up evaluation 53 days later revealed a resolution of his double vision and ptosis with no abnormality of his eye movements. The clinical evidence points to an infarction of the third cranial nerve in the periphery because of a gradually developing occlusion of one of the small penetrating arteries on the surface of the nerve itself. As a vasodilator and endothelial survival factor, VEGF functions to maintain the tone and health of the microcirculation; intravitreal inhibition with ranibizumab has been reported to lead to significant arteriolar vasoconstriction from baseline 7 and 30 days after injection (Papadopoulou et al. 2009), and systemic VEGF inhibition in animal models leads to capillary regression and the disappearance of fenestrations over time (Baffert et al. 2006). VEGF also has a critical role as a neuroprotectant in the adaptive response to ischemic injury by directly promoting anti-apoptotic gene expression in neurons and upregulating blood flow via nitric oxide (Nishijima et al. 2007). However, both ranibizumab and bevacizumab can enter the systemic circulation; the latter may utilize endogenous immunoglobulin receptors to more effectively avoid degradation and circulate with a half life of approximately 10 days in humans (Cousins & Csaky 2009) while sustaining serum levels as high as 1 ug/ml 29 days post-injection in rabbits (Bakri et al. 2007). Since mean adult serum VEGF-A levels have been reported to be in the order of 100 pg/ml (Kimura et al. 2007), there could still be enough free bevacizumab in the human circulation after intravitreal injection to neutralize some VEGF actions. Consequently, physicians should remain cognizant of the potential relationship between microvascular disturbances and anti-VEGF therapy in an elderly AMD population. Funding/support: none; financial disclosures: none; other acknowledgements: none.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,406
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa OphthalmologicaMême sujetRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207