Description Of Injuries Among Cirque Du Soleil Artists 2002-2006
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Circus arts performed by companies like Cirque du Soleil represent a rapidly growing athletic activity. Most artists are performing activities similar to highly competitive activities such as gymnastics, diving, and dance. The first step in any injury prevention program is to document the frequency and types of injuries that occur. PURPOSE: To describe the frequency of injuries according to anatomical location and type among Cirque du Soleil artists over a 5 year period from 2002 to 2006. METHODS: We obtained injury data from the Cirque du Soleil injury database. The database is used as an electronic patient record and records all injuries and associated treatments. We included any injury that occurred between Jan 1, 2002 and Dec 31, 2006 inclusive. We excluded any duplicate records for which the artist, injury date and location were identical. If a second injury was recorded to the same anatomical location within 3 months of the index injury date, we hand-searched the comments associated with the injuries and excluded any injuries that were exacerbations or re-injuries. We also excluded all personal health conditions and injuries that were not related to show or training. RESULTS: There was a total of 6000 injuries over the 5 year period. Lower extremity injuries were more common in general. In the lower extremity, and the knee (∼28%) and ankle (∼28%) were the most commonly injured areas of the lower extremity. The shoulder represented 50% of injuries to the upper extremity. Most injuries were to muscles and tendons (∼45%) and fractures or injuries to the nervous system (including concussions) were very rare (less than 5% together). Fifty percent of the injuries were very rare (less than 5% together). Fifty percent of the injuries required 2 treatments or less, and 80% of the injuries required 7 treatments or less. Overall, there was no difference in the anatomical location or types of injuries suffered by males and females (p>0.6), and the pattern of injuries has remained consistent from year to year (p>0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Circus arts performers incur injuries consistent with those of elite athletes in other activities. There is no difference in the pattern of injury among males and females.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».