MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2002579288 · doi:10.1353/cch.2013.0010

Taking Medicine: Women’s healing work and colonial contact in southern Alberta, 1880–1930 by Kristin Burnett (review)

2013· article· en· W2002579288 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paige Raibmon

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Colonialism and Colonial History · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousColonialismGlobeContextualizationHistoryGender studiesMedicineEthnologySociologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Taking Medicine: Women’s healing work and colonial contact in southern Alberta, 1880–1930 by Kristin Burnett Paige Raibmon Taking Medicine: Women’s healing work and colonial contact in southern Alberta, 1880–1930 By Kristin Burnett. Vancouver, British Columbia: UBC Press, 2010. With Taking Medicine, Kristin Burnett makes a contribution to intersecting literatures on women, colonialism, healing, and Indigenous peoples. Her main interest is women who performed a broad range of healing work in southern Alberta. As the book proceeds, her focus shifts from Indigenous women, to female medical missionaries, to graduate lay nurses. Accordingly, we gain a sense of the female actors who moved within and into this region as healers and caregivers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Thus, the book is not a study of either Indigenous or settler women per se, but of the individuals who fulfilled a particular role in a particular place and time, and of their cross-cultural interactions with patients. Burnett’s focus roots the study in place in significant and interesting ways. At the same time, it means we do not learn about the lives of these women beyond the field of therapeutics or outside of the region. Readers interested in comparative colonialisms will appreciate that throughout the book, Burnett ranges widely in her contextualization of contact among women in southern Alberta, discussing relevant and comparable situations not only throughout the rest of Canada but around the globe. She thereby situates her work within a broader literature and also compensates for some of the limitations of her source base. Burnett also provides ample historical background on the colonial history of Western Canada, a trait that scholars outside the field will find useful, though specialists in Canadian history may find slightly redundant. In Chapters One, Two, and Three, Burnett focuses on Tsuu T’ina, Nakoda, Siksika, Kainai and Piikani women. In Chapter One, she provides an overview of women’s place in the cultural and historical landscape of the region demarcated by Treaty 7 in 1877. In Chapter Two, she discusses traditional knowledge held and practiced by women from these Nations particularly in the fields of medicinal plant use and midwifery. Burnett argues that these women played crucial roles as midwives, herbalists and healers long before colonialism cast its long shadow onto their territories. Significantly, Burnett argues that Indigenous women continued to perform this work into the early years of colonial settlement not only for members of their own communities but for the first generation of settler women, as well. This intercultural dimension of health care and midwifery is of particular interest to Burnett as an instance of contact that belies colonizers’ claims to a monopoly on authority and knowledge. Far from familial networks of support and Western medical authorities, settler women turned to Indigenous women for their expertise. Extending a well-established narrative of fur trade history to the sphere of bodily care, Burnett demonstrates an instance of cooperative contact born of necessity. Settler women turned to Indigenous women because they had no other choice. The resulting encounters were sometimes fleeting, sometimes enduring. Documenting the existence of these relationships is a key part of Burnett’s contribution. In so doing she adds texture to our image of gendered contact frontiers, and argues that such relationships challenged Euro-Canadian stereotypes about Indigenous peoples. As Burnett realizes, however, the fact that settler women turned to Indigenous women for assistance does not in and of itself mean that they simultaneously threw over stereotypes about the inferiority of Indigenous societies. Unfortunately, Burnett’s source base does not allow for a fuller picture of these relationships on the ground. We do not know the extent of cross-cultural bonds of friendship and mutual respect that may have developed, or whether settler women altered their preexisting beliefs as a result of such intimate encounters with Indigenous women. Burnett organizes Chapters Four through Six chronologically to focus on successive waves of female health care providers. In these chapters, she emphasizes connections between the advent of Western health care and the broader colonial project of dispossession. For Burnett, the therapeutic work that Euro-Canadian women conducted was “at the heart of the colonial project in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,218
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Colonialism and Colonial HistoryMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207