MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2002785442 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2011.0048

Protestants, Convents, and Seduction by Matthew 10:37

2011· article· en· W2002785442 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miriam Elizabeth Burstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProtestantismOppressionReligious studiesHistoryInterpretation (philosophy)TheologyArtPhilosophyLawPoliticsPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Protestants, Convents, and Seduction by Matthew 10:37 Miriam Elizabeth Burstein (bio) He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. — kjv Matt. 10:37 Matthew 10:37 has always been a hard saying. But throughout modern history, Protestants and Catholics have turned to this verse to urge conversions, counsel strength under oppression, or motivate martyrdom. Catholics, though, have also found in it a call to leave the world for the cloister, and in the nineteenth century, Anglo-American Protestants found this represented a dangerous misreading of the verse indeed. It was all very well to justify leaving [End Page 16] convents with Matthew 10:37—one anti-Catholic polemicist assures us, for example, that Charlotte de Bourbon (later Princess of Orange) was “supported” by Matthew 10:37 when she decamped from her convent in 1572 (“Abbess” 40)1 —but what was wrong with the arguments for joining them? For Protestants on the anti-convent warpath, the dangerous allure of Matthew 10:37 emblematized all that was wrong with Roman Catholic (and, indeed, Anglo-Catholic) appeals to tradition and authority in the interpretation of scripture. By the mid-Victorian period, this topic was on many Protestants’ minds. In his 1873 survey of the state of convents in the British Isles, Catholic author John Nicholas Murphy counted 258 convents in Britain (368); by 1880, the number exceeded three hundred (O’Brien 112). Even worse, from a Protestant point of view, the Oxford Movement’s call for the Church of England to abandon its post-Reformation “Protestantism” sparked not only multiple prominent conversions to Roman Catholicism in the 1840s—most famously that of John Henry Newman—but also a drive for Anglican religious communities, beginning with the Park Village Sisterhood of the Holy Cross in 1845. By century’s end, more than ninety communities had been founded, including Priscilla Lydia Sellon’s Ascot Priory (Mumm 3). Sellon’s use of Matthew 10:37 while corresponding with a would-be Sister of Mercy, Augusta Wale, was one of the many things that scandalized Protestant observers (Rodgers 38); the controversy over confession and other “popish” behaviours at Ascot Priory led to a full-fledged inquiry in 1852 (Hartman; Kollar). By the 1860s, the “ultra-Protestant” politician Charles Newdigate Newdegate began making a name for himself by reviving the stalled 1850s parliamentary initiatives for inspecting convents, introducing his first such bill in 1864 (Arnstein 63—64). Conveniently, just one year after Newdegate ramped up his anti-convent crusade, Georgiana Malcolm published her translation of Luther’s Letters to Women, in which Luther cites Matthew 10:37 to justify nuns leaving a convent against their parents’ wishes (11). Traditionally, Matthew 10:37 did justify vocations, as in the case of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (1090—1153). Nineteenth-century Protestants countered this tradition by asking when believers were obligated to reject those closest to their hearts. Classic commentators like John Calvin (whose Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists was newly translated in 1845) and the Puritan Matthew Henry glossed the verse by stipulating that Christ “assign[ed] the highest value to piety” (Calvin 471) and that “children must love their parents, and parents must love their children; but if they love them better than Christ, they are unworthy of him” (Henry 145). These commentaries try to reconcile the injunctions in Matthew 10:37 and, even more intimidatingly, Luke 14:26 (“If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple” [kjv]) with other passages that enjoin love and duty to one’s family and conclude that a hierarchy of obligations is at work: love one’s family, yes, but love Christ more. But it took the influential evangelical commentator Thomas Scott to inadvertently solve the problem before it arose. He [End Page 17] explained that “when matters should come to such extremities … a man must lose the comfort and favour of his nearest relations, and incur their enmity, unless he renounced or disobeyed Christ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,973
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207