Presenza dei francescani conventuali nel Collegio dei Teologi dell'Universita di Padova: Appunti d'archivio (1510-1806) (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Presenza dei francescani conventuali nel Collegio dei Teologi dell’Università di Padova: Appunti d’archivio (1510–1806) Paul F. Grendler Presenza dei francescani conventuali nel Collegio dei Teologi dell’Università di Padova: Appunti d’archivio (1510–1806). By Antonino Poppi. (Padua: Centro Studi Antoniani. 2003. Pp. 222. €20,00 paperback.) This is a detailed summary of the acts of the College of Doctors of Theology in Padua from 1510 until Napoleon suppressed it in 1806. The study is based on the manuscript atti of the college found in the Archivio Storico dell'Università di Padova. The members of the college possessed doctorates from the college and oversaw theology instruction and doctoral degree examinations. While the college included members from the various medieval monastic orders with convents in Padua, the Jesuits, Barnabites, Somaschans, and other new orders of the Catholic Reformation were not members. The book focuses on the participation in the affairs of the college by the Franciscan Conventuals, the friars from the famous convent of Saint Anthony (called Il Santo), the convent to which Poppi belongs. Well known for his numerous publications on Renaissance philosophy and theology at Padua, Poppi has taught at Il Santo and the University of Padua. The college had few members in the early sixteenth century, but grew to one hundred at the end of the sixteenth century and about 180 in the middle of the [End Page 298] eighteenth century. About half were resident in Padua and participated in the activities of the college. The Conventual Franciscans, who espoused Scotist theological positions, were particularly prominent in the seventeenth century. Only four or five members of the college taught at the University of Padua. They held the professorships of Thomist theology, Scotist theology, Thomist metaphysics, Scotist metaphysics, and Sacred Scripture from 1551. They served most often as promoters for degree candidates. Other members of the college taught in their own convents or did not teach. The records are sparse for the sixteenth century but ample for the following two centuries. They do not deal with issues of doctrine with one exception, but with everyday affairs of the college, especially the conferral of degrees, election of officers, and, later, responses to directives from the civil government. An issue throughout was the tendency of candidates to seek degrees outside of the college of theologians, from counts palatine, from individuals with papal authority to confer degrees such as generals of religious orders, and from institutions beyond Padua. These candidates sought to avoid the high doctoral fees of the college of theologians and sometimes the Paduan examinations altogether. Since every member of the college involved in a degree examination and ceremony received payment from the candidate, the college discovered that members of the college were pressuring degree candidates to nominate them as promoters. The college affirmed the right of candidates to choose freely. From time to time thecollege had to deal with the hostility of arts students and the college of doctors of arts. In the eighteenth century the civil government increasingly intervened in college affairs. This book is carefully documented with extensive quotations from the acts. It includes useful bibliography and appendices listing all the Conventual Franciscans who held offices in the college. This is a limited study of an institution which has received little attention and a good building block for further studies. We look forward to Poppi's future studies, especially his edition of the statutes of the college. Paul F. Grendler University of Toronto (Emeritus) Copyright © 2004 The Catholic University of America Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».