MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2003448366 · doi:10.4088/pcc.11l01285

Manic Episode Associated With Clarithromycin in a Patient With Medically Treated Depression

2012· article· en· W2003448366 sur OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Y. M. Kwan, Kiran Rabheru

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésManiaClarithromycinMedicineCitalopramLorazepamDepression (economics)Bipolar disorderOlanzapinePediatricsMoodAnesthesiaPsychiatryPsychologyInternal medicineAnxietySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Antibiotic-induced mania, or antibiomania, is an uncommon cause of manic episodes.1 Clarithromycin is one of the most frequently implicated antibiotics.1 Here, a case of clarithromycin-associated mania in a patient with medically treated depression is presented. Case report. Mr A, a 53-year-old schoolteacher with a history of depression, developed increasing distractibility while driving on the highway in 2011, elevating to the point at which he had to stop driving. The patient believed he was having a stroke and presented himself to the emergency department. On examination, the patient displayed agitation, pressured and tangential speech, flight of ideas, distractibility, grandiosity, and disorganized behavior. He became increasingly agitated and a “code white” was called; as a result, the patient was restrained and given haloperidol and lorazepam intramuscularly, which calmed him down. Medical workup was negative for another cause of mania. Mr A had been taking oral citalopram 20 mg daily for the last 15 years to treat his depression. He was also taking oral clarithromycin 1,000 mg daily, which had been prescribed for sinusitis 5 days prior to presentation. The patient noted elevated mood, increased pleasure in his job, and requiring less sleep 1 day after starting clarithromycin. The patient was admitted, and clarithromycin and citalopram were discontinued. Three days later, Mr A’s condition was stable, and he had few manic symptoms. He was started on olanzapine, 10 mg at bedtime, and lamotrigine, which was titrated to 50 mg twice daily. The patient was discharged 10 days after admission. Nightingale et al2 described the first cases of clarithromycin-induced mania in 1995 in 2 patients with AIDS who were prescribed clarithromycin to treat a Mycobacterium avium complex infection. About a year later, in 1996, Cone et al3 described the first case of clarithromycin-induced mania in a patient without AIDS who was prescribed clarithromycin for a soft-tissue infection. Four other cases of clarithromycin-induced mania have since been described in which clarithromycin was prescribed for sinusitis or H pylori infection.4–7 In all cases, mania resolved with discontinuation of clarithromycin.2–7 In only 1 case did the patient have a history of depression.5 The mechanism for antibiotic-induced mania is currently unknown, although several theories have been proposed, including raised serum concentration of the antibiotic (leading to higher central nervous system penetration), antibiotic interactions with neurotransmitters, and antibiotic interactions with cortisol and prostaglandins.1 Management of antibiotic-induced mania typically involves discontinuation of the antibiotic and possible addition of mood-stabilizing medications.1,7 In this case, manic symptoms began to subside with discontinuation of clarithromycin. It is not clear whether clarithromycin is the direct cause of the manic episode, but it could be a contributing trigger. However, due to the past history of depression, the high degree of mania, and the occurrence during driving, mood-stabilizing medications were prescribed. Clarithromycin-induced mania is not a common occurrence, but consideration of this phenomenon could be useful in the differential diagnosis of an episode of mania.7

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,052
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,630

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Primary Care Companion For CNS DisordersMême sujetPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatmentTravaux en français237 207