MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2003758652 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0141

Substance over Spectacle (review)

2008· article· en· W2003758652 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael Kluckner

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpectacleArchitectureArt historySuiteHistoryArtMedia studiesVisual artsSociologyLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Substance over Spectacle Michael Kluckner Andrew Gruft . Substance over Spectacle. Arsenal Pulp/Morris and Helen Belkin Art Gallery 2005. 224. $39.95 In 2005, eighteen years after he curated A Measure of Consensus: A Survey of Canadian Architecture, UBC architecture professor emeritus Andrew Gruft mounted another exhibition at the Belkin gallery on the UBC campus. His book Substance over Spectacle records and supplements it with a wide-ranging suite of essays by him and architects George Baird, Sherry McKay, Georges Adamczyk, and Marco Polo. Gruft's goal is to 'raise the profile of Canadian architecture,' which he feels gets little respect and support. He and McKay echo the familiar lament about Canadian identity and international anonymity, summed up in the first line of Gruft's introduction: 'Why does no one seem to know about Canadian architecture?' The buildings themselves display a self-confidence perhaps missing in the text. The main part of the book, running from pages 19 to 175, showcases a diverse range of recent projects from twenty-seven different firms. Following the sun, the buildings range from east to west coasts, beginning with three evocative Maritimes coastal houses by MacKay Lyons and ending with a suite of rapid transit stations on the Millennium line of the Vancouver SkyTrain system. In between are a city hall, a water treatment plant, and a blizzard of academic and institutional buildings and multi-family housing. The photography and colour reproduction are very good; some projects include conceptual drawings and plans, reproduced (in most cases) large enough to decode; each firm's work is described with the equivalent of an artist's statement, mostly written in relatively plain English. The book has a soft cover with French flaps; unfortunately it lacks a sewn binding, so it has an annoying habit of snapping shut if unattended. But it is a practical-sized book, not a thudding coffee-table tome, befitting its title and the country that spawned it. The works demonstrate the sharply regional nature of Canada and the contrasts between urban and rural, east and west, personal and [End Page 438] institutional. The high-rise residential work of James Cheng is unmistakably Vancouver, as the university and institutional buildings in Ontario and Québec look 'eastern.' It is this 'mannered regionalism' that dominated the 1990s, according to former Canadian Architect editor Marco Polo. The Quebec scene is skilfully analyzed by Georges Adamczyk as a combination of postmodernism and a rediscovery or 'reappropriation' of its heritage. Sustainability is a word often used in the text, but it is the sustainability of these new buildings. Recycling, whether of buildings or materials, receives little attention, and projects that add layers onto existing urban fabric are few and far between. One notable exception is the Umbra World Headquarters in Toronto, by Kohn Shnier, a dramatic sexing-up 'like sunglasses' of a mundane industrial building in a bleak urban-edge landscape. What about the collegial and collaborative nature of architecture in this age of celebrities? George Baird's essay reflects on the 'starchitects' of the international scene and wonders whether some of the Canadians in the exhibition, such as Vancouverites John and Patricia Patkau, should be branded as auteurs. But regardless of such matters, readers will applaud the listing of the members of the teams for each project, supplemented by Marco Polo's ruminations on the complexities of life for young architects in a globalizing world of huge projects. 'Substance over spectacle' is a good title. There are few flights of fancy and little evidence of the craving sometimes heard in city councils and chambers of commerce for an iconic Sydney Opera House or Bilbao Guggenheim plunked in the centre of town. But the truly evocative works hark back to the folkloric Canada of settlement in a hard land – shelter from the storm – such as the above-mentioned Maritimes houses. And there is an anomaly in this book of buildings: the landscape installations in Quebec of the architect Pierre Thibault entitled Winter Gardens. Lanterns placed in a grid on a frozen lake. A line of igloo-like, lamp-lit tents photographed at night stretching across a frozen lake and disappearing up a hillside. This is pure...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,100
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,335

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1000,026

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism StudiesTravaux en français237 207