Leading the change
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For the second time, the New Investigators’ Symposium of the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) was fully initiated, organized and executed by the ISH Fellows, New Investigators and the New Investigator Committee (NIC); with outstanding support of the ISH President (Stephen Harrap), Officer at Large (Bo Carlberg) and ISH Secretariat [1–3]. The symposium was held on 29 September 2012, as a satellite meeting of the 24th Scientific Meeting of the ISH, at the historic University of Sydney campus. The major theme of the meeting was ‘leading the change’ to foster a collaborative effort of innovation and global leadership in the field of hypertension amongst new investigators. Now in its third year, the New Investigators Network of ISH also provides a forum for these emerging leaders to share their own insights as well as research-related experiences (Fig. 1) [1–3].FIGURE 1: ISH New Investigators at the Second New Investigators’ Symposium.Preparations for the symposium began almost a year ago, through the joint effort of the NIC, Secretariat and Stephen Harrap. Regular monthly teleconference meetings, countless E-mail messages and widespread coverage of the event on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other social media platforms were part of the planning process. Details regarding abstract submissions were sent to ISH-affiliated hypertension societies and other ISH sister organizations in advance so that they could inform their younger members of the meeting. Each abstract was graded by ISH New Investigators and then allocated an oral or poster presentation. Delegates representing over a dozen countries registered for the event. The opening remarks were given by Fadi Charchar, the Chair of the Symposium and a member of ISH NIC. Four oral sessions were jointly moderated by NIC members and other New Investigators who attended the conference. The scientific level of all presentations was outstanding – the programme covered a wide range of topics from molecular biology and genetics to the newest trends of hypertension management. The discussion following each presentation was very stimulating. Posters were viewed during lunch and tea breaks. Scoring of each oral and poster presentations was based on abstract grades as well as voting by the NIC and the attendees. New Investigator Committee members, Praveen Veerabhadrappa and Dylan Burger, gave a special talk on the opportunities available to new investigators through the ISH New Investigator Network. Current NIC/ISH initiatives such as the New Investigator of the Month feature, mentorship scheme and ‘Explore’ (new investigator's newsletter) were highlighted. The NIC and the attendees were thrilled to welcome Dr Stuart Spencer, Executive Editor of The Lancet, who had kindly agreed to give a special guest lecture on ‘How to write a research paper and get it published in a good quality medical journal’. Dr Spencer's illuminating lecture was enthusiastically received by all early career scientists. The Lancet Editor's perspective on submission, review and publication process provided many very useful tips on how to prepare a paper that could be published in one of the top medical journals. Dr Spencer stressed upon the importance of simplicity, clarity and brevity in writing. After the closing remarks given by Bo Carlberg, the oral and poster award winners were presented by Dr Spencer (Table 1). Concluding with a social event at a local restaurant participants were given a further opportunity to network and make new friends. Indeed, many new scientific collaborations were formed at this meeting. This was an extremely memorable session hosted by the NIC/ISH for the future generation of hypertension leaders.TABLE 1: Oral and poster presentation awardsThe NIC would also like to extend special thanks to the ISH new investigators who graded abstracts, attended and presented during the meeting. Our special thanks also go to the ISH conference managers, Helen Horsfield, Joanna Prendergast and Josephine Cass for their outstanding support during the past 2 years. The NIC received many encouraging comments from both new investigators and senior ISH members to continue organizing such thought provoking events. The NIC pledges to continue its dedicated work. The NIC and ISH would like to congratulate the following award winners at the 2nd New Investigators’ Symposium, 29 September 2012, University of Sydney. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,024 | 0,052 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,024 | 0,019 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,020 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,013 | 0,029 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,088 | 0,048 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».