MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2003892903 · doi:10.1353/cat.0.0313

Redemption and Ritual: The Eastern-Rite Redemptorists of North America, 1906–2006 (review)

2009· article· en· W2003892903 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Galadza

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRiteUkrainianHistoryArchivistClassicsAncient historyReligious studiesEthnologyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Redemption and Ritual: The Eastern-Rite Redemptorists of North America, 1906–2006 Peter Galadza Redemption and Ritual: The Eastern-Rite Redemptorists of North America, 1906–2006. By Paul Laverdure. (Yorkton, Canada: Redeemer’s Voice Press. 2007. Pp. xviii, 421. $19.95 paperback. ISBN 978-0-978-19442-0.) This is a must read for anyone interested in Eastern Catholicism and the Ukrainian Catholic Church in particular. It is also indispensable as a micro-history of a unique North American religious community. Paul Laverdure, who holds advanced degrees in religious studies and history and is a longtime archivist, has produced a meticulously researched study based on materials written in a dozen languages and scattered in repositories throughout the Western world. The Eastern-Rite (more specifically, Byzantine-Rite) Redemptorists evolved from the pastoral solicitude of a Belgian Redemptorist, Achiel Delaere, who came to Western Canada in 1899 and soon realized that many of the Catholics in his prairie parishes were Greco-Catholics (usually called “Greek Catholics”). Motivated also by a sense of “white man’s burden,” Delaere soon learned [End Page 182] Ukrainian and in 1906 received permission to celebrate in the Byzantine Rite. Several factors combined to impede his efforts (and those of his Belgian confrères, who constituted the majority of the community until the 1930s, when men of Ukrainian background began outnumbering the Belgians). To begin with, the fact that Roman Catholic authorities prevented married Greco-Catholic clergy from Eastern Europe from following their faithful to the New World—and 95 percent of Ukrainian priests were married—created resentment among the immigrants who could not understand why they had to be served by Belgians who had only a rudimentary knowledge of their rite and often spoke poor Ukrainian. Conversely, as the archival materials demonstrate—and the faithful no doubt sensed—these Belgians considered the Byzantine Rite a necessary evil to be tolerated until the Ukrainians could be assimilated to the Roman Rite. This spawned a cycle of mutual resentment: the Belgians were offended by the ingratitude of many Ukrainians, and the Ukrainians were angered by the Belgians’ disdain for their own clergy. In regard to contempt for married priests, the Belgian Redemptorists were just as obsessive as the Vatican or other Roman Catholic authorities. This point relates to one of the few areas where Laverdure could have nuanced his presentation. What Laverdure describes as a Ukrainian nationalist rejection of non-Ukrainian clergy was actually less a matter of nationalism and more a matter of attachment to distinctive religious traditions. The immigrant prairie farmers simply wanted clergy who knew and loved their liturgy, understood their mentality, and spoke their language. To be sure, nationalism fueled the creation in 1916 of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada, largely composed of disaffected Greco-Catholics. Between the 1960s and 1980s, it prevented individual Redemptorists from embracing a more universalist agenda as well as English in worship. However, in its “pure” form, nationalism did not permeate North American Ukrainian Catholicism until the post-World War II takeover of Church life by political émigrés, who managed to co-opt the Church as a surrogate for lost statehood. Laverdure reveals the tensions between the Redemptorists and the first Ukrainian (Ruthenian) Catholic bishop of Canada, Nykyta Budka (appointed in 1912), as well as the conflicts that nearly led to a disbandment of the Eastern-Rite Redemptorist mission in the mid-1920s. In the late 1920s, the mission was transferred from Belgian to English Canadian control, and the latter proved to be almost brutal in their demands for liturgical and linguistic assimilation. Rescue came in 1931 when the mission was placed under the Ruthenian Vice Province of Lviv (Polish Ukraine). The creation of the Lviv Vice Province is a fascinating example of a missionary need—in western Canada—spawning a vibrant community in a Church’s indigenous territory. The Redemptorists of Ukraine became a powerful force for spiritual renewal and bolstered the Church’s ability to survive in the underground during the Soviet era (1944–89). [End Page 183] During this same period, in the west the Yorkton Province of Eastern Redemptorists (elevated from vice-provincial status in 1961) shared the fate of many religious...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,435
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,502

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œCatholic historical reviewMême sujetMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesTravaux en français237 207