Effect of Viscosity and Diffusion Coefficient on the Kinetics of Bubble Growth in Solution-Gas Drive in Heavy Oil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Some of the heavy oil reservoirs in Alberta and Western Saskatchewan show anomalously high primary recovery and high flow rate under solution gas drive. Several theories have been proposed for the anomalous behaviour. However, only a few theories look at the basic physics of the problem and find out the reason for this favourable behaviour. The process of solution gas drive involves nucleation of gas bubbles followed by bubble growth and finally flow of gas. In his work, the aspect of bubble growth is studied in heavy oil and in light oil. A numerical model is developed, including the hydrodynamic and mass transfer effects to investigate the effect of viscous and diffusional forces on bubble growth. An objective of the paper is to show that the effect of oil viscosity on bubble growth might be insignificant, even for heavy oils. A secondary objective is to examine the validity of the popular rowth model of R(t) = atb, when both diffusional and hydrodynamic forces are acting. The case of a gradual decline in pressure is studied, which more closely simulates the reservoir condition, and is compared with a step decline in pressure. It is found that the constants a and b in the above model need to be found for the conditions of interest; they depend on oil-type, rate of pressure drop, mass transfer boundary condition, etc. In another part of the paper, the gas phase growth during the solution gas drive experiment is modelled and the effect of various parameters, such as viscosity, depletion rate and diffusion coefficient, on the process is studied. It is found that, in a constant volumetric rate of depletion process, the system compressibility might remain unchanged for some time, even after bubbles have nucleated and while they are growing. Hence, the maximum supersaturation observed does not have to correspond with the nucleation pressure. Introduction The process of solution gas drive involves nucleation of bubbles in oil as the pressure falls below the bubblepoint pressure, following which the bubbles grow. During growth, the bubbles come in contact with each other and, with the breaking of the lamella, coalesce to form interconnected gas bubbles, often with multiple branches. The process of solution gas drive in heavy oil reservoirs shows a number of anomalies when compared to that in a light oil reservoir. A number of theories(1-7) have been proposed to explain this behaviour of the heavy oil reservoir. However, only a few look at the basic physics of the problem. In this paper, an attempt has been made to study bubble growth with specific application to the solution gas drive process by looking at the physics of bubble growth and study the effect of viscosity and other parameters. As a first step, a single bubble growth in bulk is considered and the effect of the porous medium is not included. The bubble growth in light oil, is compared with that in heavy oil, and the reason for the differences sought.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».