The New Audiology Committee of the IALP Cooperates with the WHO in the Global Work on Problems of Hearing-Impaired People
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Because a special motivation of audiologists to work in the IALP and to visit its congresses was lacking so far, the Audiology Committee should improve this situation by initiatives which increase the attractiveness of audiology in the IALP. Effective actions and projects, symposia, publication of guidelines, a special edition of Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica on audiology as well as articles on audiological topics in this journal, and an attractive webpage are seen as efficient ways to reach this goal and are planned. With these activities, the Audiology Committee aims to increase international visibility of itself and of audiology within the IALP. Currently, the committee projects are aligned with the aims of the WHO in the field of audiology. One of the WHO projects is to launch the provision of appropriate and affordable hearing aids and services worldwide, especially in developing countries. Another WHO initiative is the encouragement of countries, with WHO technical support, to conduct random sample, populationbased prevalence and cause surveys of deafness and hearing impairment. The data will be used in planning, determination of priorities, economic analysis, and raising awareness. A global data bank on deafness and hearing impairment is being developed using data from the WHO Protocol Surveys and other published and unpublished sources. A forthcoming activity will assess cost-effectiveness of interventions against deafness and hearing impairment as part of an initiative on the Economic A new Audiology Committee of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) has recently been founded. An Audiology Committee had already existed before, but a new one was initiated because the World Health Organization (WHO), with which the IALP has informal status, had asked the IALP for more activities in the field of audiology. Therefore, the IALP board decided to refound this committee and asked the author of this editorial to become its chairperson. The IALP president sent a message to the WHO with a statement that the IALP Audiology Committee will collaborate with the WHO to develop guidelines for the screening of neonates, children, and adults for deafness and hearing loss. After a period of searching for members since fall 2006, the committee was officially established in August 2007 during the 27th IALP World Congress in Copenhagen, Denmark. The committee consists of members who represent all continents and all specializations in the field of audiology, and who are enthusiastic and willing to work voluntarily on a global network to improve the health and quality of life of persons with hearing disorders. Members come from Germany, China, Canada, the USA, Australia, Serbia, Egypt, Chile, Brazil, Sweden, and India. The Audiology Committee has developed a working plan for the next 3 years which includes a variety of initiatives, activities, and projects as described in the following sections. Published online: December 6, 2007
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».