MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2005476734 · doi:10.1111/acps.12394

Homeless and mentally ill – a mental healthcare challenge for <scp>E</scp>urope

2015· letter· en· W2005476734 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wolfgang Gäebel, Jürgen Zielasek

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHomelessness and Social Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMentally illMental healthcarePsychiatryMental healthHealth carePsychologyMental health careMedicineMental illnessPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The study by Stergiopoulos et al. 1 draws the attention to the important issue of cognitive impairments in homeless adults with mental illnesses. The majority of the study participants demonstrated some degree of cognitive impairment, and this was only partly explained by the underlying mental illness. The factors contributing to the development of cognitive impairments in the population of homeless adults are largely unknown but include higher age, lower education, ethnicity and the presence of psychosis, as this study showed. The study was performed in Canada, but its results seem to be generalizable to other industrialized countries including the European countries. Addressing the cognitive impairments in future studies with the aim to improve mental health care for mentally ill homeless persons in Europe will add to the challenge to optimize the quality of mental health care also for socially marginalized groups in Europe. These include not only the homeless, but also the ethnic minority groups, refugees or people with physical or mental handicaps. The rate of mental illness in the homeless population is about 50%, and an additional 25% suffer from a comorbidity of mental illness and substance use problems 2. Rates seem to vary greatly locally and it was recommended to use local surveys and harmonized definitions of homelessness across countries 3. In the European Union, on any given night, approximately 410 000 people are homeless 3. Homeless people with mental illnesses are in need of several essential requirements: housing, social security including work and mental health care. While there are structured programmes with efficiency in improving recovery by providing housing and social security, for example, ‘Housing First’, by and also by Busch-Geertsema 4, 5, the issue of access to mental health care is still open. Reviews showed that case management, assertive community treatment and critical time interventions were effective models of healthcare delivery including the improvement of symptoms of mental disorders, reducing substance use, decreasing psychiatric hospitalizations and increasing out-patient contacts 2, 6. A specific review about homeless young people showed that for this special population, the evidence base was small, and it was concluded that more methodologically sound research was needed to determine which specific interventions were beneficial 7. An important issue besides mental health is general health in the homeless population, given the 5–6 times excess mortality rate, the increased rate of infectious and traumatic disorders, and the undertreatment of common disorders such as hypertension and diabetes 8. Thus, any mental health intervention will also need to address the question of general health care. A final issue is how far cognitive impairments may interfere with help-seeking and mental healthcare service use, and how these barriers can be overcome. Some studies suggest that by addressing cognitive impairments, healthcare service use may be increased 9. Importantly, it is well known that there are specific high-risk periods for becoming homeless, for example, when being released from prison or following treatment in psychiatric facilities, individuals ageing out of the child welfare system and those fleeing violence 3. Prevention programmes would need to identify and address those entering into such high-risk phases of their lives. Taken together, it is evident that mental health in homeless people needs to be addressed by special programmes including case management programmes linking services and assertive outreach programmes. Besides mental health, somatic health, housing and social security need to be parts of innovative comprehensive programmes, which seem to have the highest likelihood given the currently available evidence in this field of mental healthcare research. This is a task which mental healthcare services alone will not be able to accomplish. Socio-economic security, social inclusion and empowerment are additional requirements which can only be achieved if society as a whole, social security services and health insurers collaborate efficiently. On the patient side, trust in services, safety of services and respect by providers are obviously important elements 7. While the study by Stergiopoulos et al. shows that cognitive impairments are an important domain of the psychopathology of many homeless persons and clearly need to be addressed, it is probable that comprehensive approaches including cognitive remediation besides mental and general healthcare, and the provision of social services and housing, are needed to increase the mental health of this especially vulnerable population. One of the aims for European psychiatry will be to identify the most effective elements of such comprehensive programmes, to develop and disseminate such programmes and to provide studies evaluating their implementation in mental health care in Europe. Healthcare providers are advised to address social policies and structural factors which may lead to homelessness 6. One challenge will be to increase the trust of homeless people with mental illness in such services, a process which will also needs to address aspects of high-quality service provision, knowledge about services, and providing experiences of non-coerciveness of mental health service use 10 – this will probably become a central element not just for recruiting those in need of such services, but also to remain in contact. Another challenge will be to ascertain that it is not the poorest of the poor who suffer most from the consequences of the current economic crisis in Europe – homelessness is on the increase in Europe and welfare reforms may endanger the provision of healthcare services to the mentally ill 11 including those who are homeless. The European Union has observed that there are increasing numbers of families, women and children, migrants and members of specific ethnic groups who have increased rates of homelessness (http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1061&langId=en; last accessed December 3, 2014). A recent study by the European Commission showed the large variability in service provision and service accessibility between different European countries 12. Obviously, harmonized criteria for homelessness and special services for especially vulnerable groups will be necessary. It will be important for European psychiatrists not only just to monitor such developments, but also to raise their voices if this leads to new mental healthcare requirements. Psychiatry as a medical specialty has a long history of caring for the homeless, providing clinical services and advocacy 13. Homelessness as a mental healthcare challenge will need not only to remain on the agenda of European psychiatry, but to gain increasing attention by psychiatrists and those responsible for developing psychiatry specialty and continuing medical education curricula. What is to be done? One area of action for European psychiatrists will be to establish mental healthcare agendas addressing the factors identified as barriers to mental healthcare for homeless people. Promoting trust in mental healthcare services will take centre stage, and this may involve information programmes for the homeless and barrier-free access to the services. Such initiatives will need sustained funding and should be evaluated regarding their effectiveness.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,555
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,390
Écart entre enseignants0,329 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa Psychiatrica ScandinavicaMême sujetHomelessness and Social IssuesTravaux en français237 207